+/**
+ * wx_setup_rx_resources - allocate Rx resources (Descriptors)
+ * @rx_ring: rx descriptor ring (for a specific queue) to setup
+ *
+ * Returns 0 on success, negative on failure
+ **/
+static int wx_setup_rx_resources(struct wx_ring *rx_ring)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rx_ring->dev;
+	int orig_node = dev_to_node(dev);
+	int numa_node = -1;
+	int size, ret;
+
+	size = sizeof(struct wx_rx_buffer) * rx_ring->count;
+
+	if (rx_ring->q_vector)
+		numa_node = rx_ring->q_vector->numa_node;
+
+	rx_ring->rx_buffer_info = vmalloc_node(size, numa_node);
+	if (!rx_ring->rx_buffer_info)
+		rx_ring->rx_buffer_info = vmalloc(size);
+	if (!rx_ring->rx_buffer_info)
+		goto err;
+
+	/* Round up to nearest 4K */
+	rx_ring->size = rx_ring->count * sizeof(union wx_rx_desc);
+	rx_ring->size = ALIGN(rx_ring->size, 4096);
+
+	set_dev_node(dev, numa_node);
+	rx_ring->desc = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, rx_ring->size,
+					   &rx_ring->dma, GFP_KERNEL);
+	set_dev_node(dev, orig_node);
+	rx_ring->desc = dma_alloc_coherent(dev, rx_ring->size,
+					   &rx_ring->dma, GFP_KERNEL);

Is this double allocation correct?

   Andrew