Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] dpll: Add DPLL framework base functions

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 09:50:19 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:

quoted

Yeah, that's a slightly tricky one. We'd probably need some form 
of second order association. Easiest if we link it to a devlink
instance, I reckon. The OCP clock card does not have netdevs so we
can't follow the namespace of netdevs (which would be the second
option).  

Why do we need this association at all?

Someone someday may want netns delegation and if we don't have the
support from the start we may break backward compat introducing it.