Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 3 authors, 2022-12-05

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] test/vsock: add big message test

From: Arseniy Krasnov <hidden>
Date: 2022-12-01 11:44:50
Also in: linux-hyperv, lkml

On 01.12.2022 12:45, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:13:06PM +0000, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
quoted
This adds test for sending message, bigger than peer's buffer size.
For SOCK_SEQPACKET socket it must fail, as this type of socket has
message size limit.

Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <redacted>
---
tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 12ef0cca6f93..a8e43424fb32 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -569,6 +569,70 @@ static void test_seqpacket_timeout_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
    close(fd);
}

+static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+    unsigned long sock_buf_size;
+    ssize_t send_size;
+    socklen_t len;
+    void *data;
+    int fd;
+
+    len = sizeof(sock_buf_size);
+
+    fd = vsock_seqpacket_connect(opts->peer_cid, 1234);
+    if (fd < 0) {
+        perror("connect");
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+
+    if (getsockopt(fd, AF_VSOCK, SO_VM_SOCKETS_BUFFER_SIZE,
+               &sock_buf_size, &len)) {
+        perror("getsockopt");
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+
+    sock_buf_size++;
+
+    data = malloc(sock_buf_size);
+    if (!data) {
+        perror("malloc");
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+
+    send_size = send(fd, data, sock_buf_size, 0);
+    if (send_size != -1) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "expected 'send(2)' failure, got %zi\n",
+            send_size);
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+
+    if (errno != EMSGSIZE) {
+        fprintf(stderr, "expected EMSGSIZE in 'errno', got %i\n",
+            errno);
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
We should make sure that this is true for all transports, but since now only virtio-vsock supports it, we should be okay.
Hm, in general: I've tested this test suite for vmci may be several months ago, and found, that some tests
didn't work. I'm thinking about reworking this test suite a little bit: each transport must have own set of
tests for features that it supports. I had feeling, that all these tests are run only with virtio transport :)
Because for example SEQPACKET mode is suported only for virtio.

Thanks
quoted
+
+    control_writeln("CLISENT");
+
+    free(data);
+    close(fd);
+}
+
+static void test_seqpacket_bigmsg_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+    int fd;
+
+    fd = vsock_seqpacket_accept(VMADDR_CID_ANY, 1234, NULL);
+    if (fd < 0) {
+        perror("accept");
+        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+    }
+
+    control_expectln("CLISENT");
+
+    close(fd);
+}
+
#define BUF_PATTERN_1 'a'
#define BUF_PATTERN_2 'b'
@@ -851,6 +915,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
        .run_client = test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_client,
        .run_server = test_stream_poll_rcvlowat_server,
    },
+    {
+        .name = "SOCK_SEQPACKET big message",
+        .run_client = test_seqpacket_bigmsg_client,
+        .run_server = test_seqpacket_bigmsg_server,
+    },
    {},
};

-- 
2.25.1
LGTM!

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help