Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 3 authors, 2022-12-12
STALE1264d
Revisions (4)
  1. v1 [diff vs current]
  2. v2 current
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]

[PATCH net v2 3/3] net: simplify sk_page_frag

From: Benjamin Coddington <hidden>
Date: 2022-12-09 18:21:10
Subsystem: networking [general], networking [sockets], the rest · Maintainers: "David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Kuniyuki Iwashima, Willem de Bruijn, Linus Torvalds

Now that in-kernel socket users that may recurse during reclaim have benn
converted to sk_use_task_frag = false, we can have sk_page_frag() simply
check that value.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <redacted>
---
 include/net/sock.h | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/sock.h b/include/net/sock.h
index 1bdba14c208f..a705cefc96f0 100644
--- a/include/net/sock.h
+++ b/include/net/sock.h
@@ -2564,19 +2564,14 @@ static inline void sk_stream_moderate_sndbuf(struct sock *sk)
  * Both direct reclaim and page faults can nest inside other
  * socket operations and end up recursing into sk_page_frag()
  * while it's already in use: explicitly avoid task page_frag
- * usage if the caller is potentially doing any of them.
- * This assumes that page fault handlers use the GFP_NOFS flags or
- * explicitly disable sk_use_task_frag.
+ * when users disable sk_use_task_frag.
  *
  * Return: a per task page_frag if context allows that,
  * otherwise a per socket one.
  */
 static inline struct page_frag *sk_page_frag(struct sock *sk)
 {
-	if (sk->sk_use_task_frag &&
-	    (sk->sk_allocation & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_MEMALLOC |
-				  __GFP_FS)) ==
-	    (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_FS))
+	if (sk->sk_use_task_frag)
 		return &current->task_frag;
 
 	return &sk->sk_frag;
-- 
2.31.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help