Re: [xdp-hints] Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/5] xdp: hints via kfuncs
From: Stanislav Fomichev <hidden>
Date: 2022-11-01 01:59:59
Also in:
bpf
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 3:57 PM Martin KaFai Lau [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/31/22 10:00 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:quoted
quoted
2. AF_XDP programs won't be able to access the metadata without using a custom XDP program that calls the kfuncs and puts the data into the metadata area. We could solve this with some code in libxdp, though; if this code can be made generic enough (so it just dumps the available metadata functions from the running kernel at load time), it may be possible to make it generic enough that it will be forward-compatible with new versions of the kernel that add new fields, which should alleviate Florian's concern about keeping things in sync.Good point. I had to convert to a custom program to use the kfuncs :-( But your suggestion sounds good; maybe libxdp can accept some extra info about at which offset the user would like to place the metadata and the library can generate the required bytecode?quoted
3. It will make it harder to consume the metadata when building SKBs. I think the CPUMAP and veth use cases are also quite important, and that we want metadata to be available for building SKBs in this path. Maybe this can be resolved by having a convenient kfunc for this that can be used for programs doing such redirects. E.g., you could just call xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb() before doing the bpf_redirect, and that would recursively expand into all the kfunc calls needed to extract the metadata supported by the SKB path?So this xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb will create a metadata layout thatCan the xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb be written as a bpf prog itself? Not sure where is the best point to specify this prog though. Somehow during bpf_xdp_redirect_map? or this prog belongs to the target cpumap and the xdp prog redirecting to this cpumap has to write the meta layout in a way that the cpumap is expecting?
We're probably interested in triggering it from the places where xdp frames can eventually be converted into skbs? So for plain 'return XDP_PASS' and things like bpf_redirect/etc? (IOW, anything that's not XDP_DROP / AF_XDP redirect). We can probably make it magically work, and can generate kernel-digestible metadata whenever data == data_meta, but the question - should we? (need to make sure we won't regress any existing cases that are not relying on the metadata)
quoted
the kernel will be able to understand when converting back to skb? IIUC, the xdp program will look something like the following: if (xdp packet is to be consumed by af_xdp) { // do a bunch of bpf_xdp_metadata_<metadata> calls and assemble your own metadata layout return bpf_redirect_map(xsk, ...); } else { // if the packet is to be consumed by the kernel xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb(ctx); return bpf_redirect(...); } Sounds like a great suggestion! xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb can maybe put some magic number in the first byte(s) of the metadata so the kernel can check whether xdp_copy_metadata_for_skb has been called previously (or maybe xdp_frame can carry this extra signal, idk).