Re: [PATCH net] sctp: fix memory leak in sctp_stream_outq_migrate()
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-11-19 03:16:31
Also in:
linux-sctp
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 3:48 AM Zhengchao Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
When sctp_stream_outq_migrate() is called to release stream out resources, the memory pointed to by prio_head in stream out is not released. The memory leak information is as follows: unreferenced object 0xffff88801fe79f80 (size 64): comm "sctp_repo", pid 7957, jiffies 4294951704 (age 36.480s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 80 9f e7 1f 80 88 ff ff 80 9f e7 1f 80 88 ff ff ................ 90 9f e7 1f 80 88 ff ff 90 9f e7 1f 80 88 ff ff ................ backtrace: [<ffffffff81b215c6>] kmalloc_trace+0x26/0x60 [<ffffffff88ae517c>] sctp_sched_prio_set+0x4cc/0x770 [<ffffffff88ad64f2>] sctp_stream_init_ext+0xd2/0x1b0 [<ffffffff88aa2604>] sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc+0x1614/0x1a30 [<ffffffff88ab7ff1>] sctp_sendmsg+0xda1/0x1ef0 [<ffffffff87f765ed>] inet_sendmsg+0x9d/0xe0 [<ffffffff8754b5b3>] sock_sendmsg+0xd3/0x120 [<ffffffff8755446a>] __sys_sendto+0x23a/0x340 [<ffffffff87554651>] __x64_sys_sendto+0xe1/0x1b0 [<ffffffff89978b49>] do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 [<ffffffff89a0008b>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd Fixes: 637784ade221 ("sctp: introduce priority based stream scheduler") Reported-by: syzbot+29c402e56c4760763cc0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <redacted> --- net/sctp/stream.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)diff --git a/net/sctp/stream.c b/net/sctp/stream.c index ef9fceadef8d..a17dc368876f 100644 --- a/net/sctp/stream.c +++ b/net/sctp/stream.c@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ static void sctp_stream_outq_migrate(struct sctp_stream *stream, * sctp_stream_update will swap ->out pointers. */ for (i = 0; i < outcnt; i++) { + if (SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext) + kfree(SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext->prio_head); + kfree(SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext); SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext = SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext; SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext = NULL;@@ -77,6 +80,9 @@ static void sctp_stream_outq_migrate(struct sctp_stream *stream, } for (i = outcnt; i < stream->outcnt; i++) { + if (SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext) + kfree(SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext->prio_head); + kfree(SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext); SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext = NULL; } --2.17.1
This is not a proper fix:
1. you shouldn't access "prio_head" outside stream_sched_prio.c.
2. the prio_head you freed might be used by other out streams, freeing
it unconditionally would cause either a double free or use after free.
I'm afraid we have to add a ".free_sid" in sctp_sched_ops, and
implement it for sctp_sched_prio, like:
+static void sctp_sched_prio_free_sid(struct sctp_stream *stream, __u16 sid)
+{
+ struct sctp_stream_priorities *prio = SCTP_SO(stream,
sid)->ext->prio_head;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!prio)
+ return;
+
+ SCTP_SO(stream, sid)->ext->prio_head = NULL;
+ for (i = 0; i < stream->outcnt; i++) {
+ if (SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext &&
+ SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext->prio_head == prio)
+ return;
+ }
+ kfree(prio);
+}
+
static void sctp_sched_prio_free(struct sctp_stream *stream)
{
struct sctp_stream_priorities *prio, *n;@@ -323,6 +340,7 @@ static struct sctp_sched_ops sctp_sched_prio = { .get = sctp_sched_prio_get, .init = sctp_sched_prio_init, .init_sid = sctp_sched_prio_init_sid, + .free_sid = sctp_sched_prio_free_sid, .free = sctp_sched_prio_free, .enqueue = sctp_sched_prio_enqueue, .dequeue = sctp_sched_prio_dequeue,
then call it in sctp_stream_outq_migrate(), like:
+static void sctp_stream_free_ext(struct sctp_stream *stream, __u16 sid)
+{
+ struct sctp_sched_ops *sched = sctp_sched_ops_from_stream(stream);
+
+ sched->free_sid(stream, sid);
+ kfree(SCTP_SO(stream, sid)->ext);
+ SCTP_SO(stream, sid)->ext = NULL;
+}
+
/* Migrates chunks from stream queues to new stream queues if needed,
* but not across associations. Also, removes those chunks to streams
* higher than the new max.@@ -70,16 +79,14 @@ static void sctp_stream_outq_migrate(structsctp_stream *stream,
* sctp_stream_update will swap ->out pointers.
*/
for (i = 0; i < outcnt; i++) {
- kfree(SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext);
+ sctp_stream_free_ext(new, i);
SCTP_SO(new, i)->ext = SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext;
SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext = NULL;
}
}
- for (i = outcnt; i < stream->outcnt; i++) {
- kfree(SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext);
- SCTP_SO(stream, i)->ext = NULL;
- }
+ for (i = outcnt; i < stream->outcnt; i++)
+ sctp_stream_free_ext(new, i);
}
Marcelo, do you see a better solution?
Thanks.