Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 4 authors, 2022-09-30

Re: [PATCH bpf-next] selftests/xsk: fix double free

From: Magnus Karlsson <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-30 07:53:20
Also in: bpf

On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 2:52 AM Martin KaFai Lau [off-list ref] wrote:
On 9/29/22 3:44 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 11:01:33AM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
quoted
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Fix a double free at exit of the test suite.

Fixes: a693ff3ed561 ("selftests/xsk: Add support for executing tests on physical device")
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index ef33309bbe49..d1a5f3218c34 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -1953,9 +1953,6 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)

     pkt_stream_delete(tx_pkt_stream_default);
     pkt_stream_delete(rx_pkt_stream_default);
-    free(ifobj_rx->umem);
-    if (!ifobj_tx->shared_umem)
shared_umem means ifobj_rx->umem and ifobj_tx->umem are the same?  No special
handling is needed and ifobject_delete() will handle it?
You are correct, we will still have a double free in that case. Thanks
for spotting. Will send a v2.
quoted
quoted
-            free(ifobj_tx->umem);
     ifobject_delete(ifobj_tx);
     ifobject_delete(ifobj_rx);
So basically we free this inside ifobject_delete().
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help