Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] slab: Remove __malloc attribute from realloc functions
From: Vlastimil Babka <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-28 21:40:57
Also in:
dri-devel, intel-wired-lan, linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-hardening, linux-media, linux-mm, lkml, llvm
On 9/28/22 19:13, Kees Cook wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 09:26:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
Hi Kees, On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 10:35 PM Kees Cook [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
The __malloc attribute should not be applied to "realloc" functions, as the returned pointer may alias the storage of the prior pointer. Instead of splitting __malloc from __alloc_size, which would be a huge amount of churn, just create __realloc_size for the few cases where it is needed. Additionally removes the conditional test for __alloc_size__, which is always defined now. Cc: Christoph Lameter <redacted> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <redacted> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <redacted> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <redacted> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>Thanks for your patch, which is now commit 63caa04ec60583b1 ("slab: Remove __malloc attribute from realloc functions") in next-20220927. Noreply@ellerman.id.au reported all gcc8-based builds to fail (e.g. [1], more at [2]): In file included from <command-line>: ./include/linux/percpu.h: In function ‘__alloc_reserved_percpu’: ././include/linux/compiler_types.h:279:30: error: expected declaration specifiers before ‘__alloc_size__’ #define __alloc_size(x, ...) __alloc_size__(x, ## __VA_ARGS__) __malloc ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ./include/linux/percpu.h:120:74: note: in expansion of macro ‘__alloc_size’ [...] It's building fine with e.g. gcc-9 (which is my usual m68k cross-compiler). Reverting this commit on next-20220927 fixes the issue. [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/14803908/ [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/1bd8b75fe6adeaa89d02968bdd811ffe708cf839/Eek! Thanks for letting me know. I'm confused about this -- __alloc_size__ wasn't optional in compiler_attributes.h -- but obviously I broke something! I'll go figure this out.
Even in latest next I can see at the end of include/linux/compiler-gcc.h /* * Prior to 9.1, -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than (and therefore the "alloc_size" * attribute) do not work, and must be disabled. */ #if GCC_VERSION < 90100 #undef __alloc_size__ #endif
-Kees