On Sun, Sep 25, 2022 at 05:29:27PM -0700, Colin Foster wrote:

Add control of an external VSC7512 chip.

Currently the four copper phy ports are fully functional. Communication to
external phys is also functional, but the SGMII / QSGMII interfaces are
currently non-functional.

Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>
---

v3
    * Remove additional entry in vsc7512_port_modes array
    * Add MFD_OCELOT namespace import, which is needed for
      vsc7512_*_io_res

and which hopefully will no longer be

Is there a difference in port count between VSC7512 and VSC7514? Nope.
Could you please give naming preference to "vsc7514" for things that are
identical?

+
+#define OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES		(OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SGMII | \
+					 OCELOT_PORT_MODE_QSGMII)
+
+static const u32 vsc7512_port_modes[VSC7512_NUM_PORTS] = {
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_INTERNAL,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SERDES,
+	OCELOT_PORT_MODE_SGMII,
+};
+
+static const u32 *vsc7512_regmap[TARGET_MAX] = {
+	[ANA] = vsc7514_ana_regmap,
+	[QS] = vsc7514_qs_regmap,
+	[QSYS] = vsc7514_qsys_regmap,
+	[REW] = vsc7514_rew_regmap,
+	[SYS] = vsc7514_sys_regmap,
+	[S0] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
+	[S1] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
+	[S2] = vsc7514_vcap_regmap,
+	[PTP] = vsc7514_ptp_regmap,
+	[DEV_GMII] = vsc7514_dev_gmii_regmap,
+};

Isn't this precisely the same as ocelot_regmap from
drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_vsc7514.c?

+
+static void ocelot_ext_phylink_validate(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port,
+					unsigned long *supported,
+					struct phylink_link_state *state)
+{
+	struct felix *felix = ocelot_to_felix(ocelot);
+	struct dsa_switch *ds = felix->ds;
+	struct dsa_port *dp;
+
+	dp = dsa_to_port(ds, port);
+
+	phylink_generic_validate(&dp->pl_config, supported, state);

It would be good to transition everybody to phylink_generic_validate(),
now that Sean Anderson's PHY rate matching work was accepted. I haven't
found the time to test this on a LS1028A-QDS board, but I hope I will
soon.

+}
+
+static struct regmap *ocelot_ext_regmap_init(struct ocelot *ocelot,
+					     const char *name)
+{
+	/* In the ocelot-mfd configuration, regmaps are attached to the device
+	 * by name alone, so dev_get_regmap will return the requested regmap
+	 * without the need to fully define the resource
+	 */
+	return dev_get_regmap(ocelot->dev->parent, name);

As discussed: nope.

+}
+
+static const struct ocelot_ops ocelot_ext_ops = {
+	.reset		= ocelot_reset,
+	.wm_enc		= ocelot_wm_enc,
+	.wm_dec		= ocelot_wm_dec,
+	.wm_stat	= ocelot_wm_stat,
+	.port_to_netdev	= felix_port_to_netdev,
+	.netdev_to_port	= felix_netdev_to_port,
+};
+
+static const struct felix_info vsc7512_info = {
+	.target_io_res			= vsc7512_target_io_res,
+	.port_io_res			= vsc7512_port_io_res,
+	.regfields			= vsc7514_regfields,
+	.map				= vsc7512_regmap,
+	.ops				= &ocelot_ext_ops,
+	.stats_layout			= vsc7514_stats_layout,
+	.vcap				= vsc7514_vcap_props,
+	.num_mact_rows			= 1024,
+	.num_ports			= VSC7512_NUM_PORTS,
+	.num_tx_queues			= OCELOT_NUM_TC,
+	.phylink_validate		= ocelot_ext_phylink_validate,
+	.port_modes			= vsc7512_port_modes,
+	.init_regmap			= ocelot_ext_regmap_init,
+};
+
+static int ocelot_ext_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+	struct dsa_switch *ds;
+	struct ocelot *ocelot;
+	struct felix *felix;
+	int err;
+
+	felix = kzalloc(sizeof(*felix), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!felix)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(dev, felix);
+
+	ocelot = &felix->ocelot;
+	ocelot->dev = dev;
+
+	ocelot->num_flooding_pgids = 1;
+
+	felix->info = &vsc7512_info;
+
+	ds = kzalloc(sizeof(*ds), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ds) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to allocate DSA switch\n");
+		goto err_free_felix;
+	}
+
+	ds->dev = dev;
+	ds->num_ports = felix->info->num_ports;
+	ds->num_tx_queues = felix->info->num_tx_queues;
+
+	ds->ops = &felix_switch_ops;
+	ds->priv = ocelot;
+	felix->ds = ds;
+	felix->tag_proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT;
+
+	err = dsa_register_switch(ds);
+	if (err) {
+		dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to register DSA switch\n");
+		goto err_free_ds;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_free_ds:
+	kfree(ds);
+err_free_felix:
+	kfree(felix);
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int ocelot_ext_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct felix *felix = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	if (!felix)
+		return 0;
+
+	dsa_unregister_switch(felix->ds);
+
+	kfree(felix->ds);
+	kfree(felix);
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);

The pattern was changed again, so can you please delete this line now,
to be in sync with the other drivers?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220921140524.3831101-12-yangyingliang@huawei.com/

+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void ocelot_ext_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct felix *felix = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	if (!felix)
+		return;
+
+	dsa_switch_shutdown(felix->ds);
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id ocelot_ext_switch_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "mscc,vsc7512-switch" },
+	{ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ocelot_ext_switch_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver ocelot_ext_switch_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name = "ocelot-switch",
+		.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ocelot_ext_switch_of_match),
+	},
+	.probe = ocelot_ext_probe,
+	.remove = ocelot_ext_remove,
+	.shutdown = ocelot_ext_shutdown,
+};
+module_platform_driver(ocelot_ext_switch_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("External Ocelot Switch driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS(MFD_OCELOT);
-- 
2.25.1