Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 00/10] dt-bindings and mt7621 devicetree changes
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-23 13:02:37
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-devicetree, linux-mediatek, linux-mips, lkml
On 23/09/2022 12:10, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote:
Hello: This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master) by David S. Miller [off-list ref]: On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:25:46 +0300 you wrote:quoted
Hello there! This patch series removes old MediaTek bindings, improves mediatek,mt7530 and mt7621 memory controller bindings and improves mt7621 DTs. v4: - Keep memory-controller node name. - Change syscon to memory-controller on mt7621.dtsi. [...]Here is the summary with links: - [v4,net-next,01/10] dt-bindings: net: drop old mediatek bindings https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/e8619b05870d - [v4,net-next,02/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530: change mt7530 switch address https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/3737c6aaf22d - [v4,net-next,03/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: mediatek,mt7530: expand gpio-controller description https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0fbca84eea37 - [v4,net-next,04/10] dt-bindings: memory: mt7621: add syscon as compatible string https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/862b19b7d4a1 - [v4,net-next,05/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: fix some dtc warnings https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/5ae75a1ae5c9 - [v4,net-next,06/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: remove interrupt-parent from switch node https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/08b9eaf454ee - [v4,net-next,07/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: change phy-mode of gmac1 to rgmii https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/97721e84f546 - [v4,net-next,08/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: change mt7530 switch address https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2b653a373b41 - [v4,net-next,09/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: fix external phy on GB-PC2 https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/247825f991b3 - [v4,net-next,10/10] mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: add GB-PC2 LEDs https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/394c3032fe0e
DTS patches should not go via network tree... We keep them separate on purpose - to split hardware description from OS-specific implementation. Best regards, Krzysztof