Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2022-09-30

Re: [PATCH 1/1] netfilter: nft_fib: Fix for rpath check with VRF devices

From: Guillaume Nault <hidden>
Date: 2022-09-30 14:11:57
Also in: netfilter-devel

On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 01:39:08PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
index 8970d0b4faeb..1d7e520d9966 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_fib_ipv6.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ static int nft_fib6_flowi_init(struct flowi6 *fl6, const struct nft_fib *priv,
 	if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6->daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL) {
 		lookup_flags |= RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE;
 		fl6->flowi6_oif = get_ifindex(dev ? dev : pkt->skb->dev);
+	} else if ((priv->flags & NFTA_FIB_F_IIF) &&
+		   (netif_is_l3_master(dev) || netif_is_l3_slave(dev))) {
+		fl6->flowi6_oif = dev->ifindex;
 	}
I'm not very familiar with nft code, but it seems dev can be NULL here,
so netif_is_l3_master() can dereference a NULL pointer.

Shouldn't we test dev in the 'else if' condition?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help