Thread (36 messages) flat view 36 messages, 8 authors, 2022-08-25

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/12] mm, memcg: Add new helper get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup

From: Shakeel Butt <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-18 22:23:29
Also in: bpf, cgroups, linux-mm

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 7:32 AM Yafang Shao [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
We want to open a cgroup directory and pass the fd into kernel, and then
in the kernel we can charge the allocated memory into the open cgroup if it
has valid memory subsystem. In the bpf subsystem, the opened cgroup will
be store as a struct obj_cgroup pointer, so a new helper
get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup() is introduced.

It also add a comment on why the helper  __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg()
must be protected by rcu read lock.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <redacted>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h |  1 +
 mm/memcontrol.c            | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index 2f0a611..901a921 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1713,6 +1713,7 @@ static inline void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 int __memcg_kmem_charge_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp, int order);
 void __memcg_kmem_uncharge_page(struct page *page, int order);

+struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgrp);
 struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_current(void);
 struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_page(struct page *page);
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 618c366..0409cc4 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2895,6 +2895,14 @@ struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_obj(void *p)
        return page_memcg_check(folio_page(folio, 0));
 }

+/*
+ * Pls. note that the memg->objcg can be freed after it is deferenced,
+ * that can happen when the memcg is changed from online to offline.
+ * So this helper must be protected by read rcu lock.
+ *
+ * After obj_cgroup_tryget(), it is safe to use the objcg outside of the rcu
+ * read-side critical section.
+ */
The comment is too verbose. My suggestion would be to add
WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held()) in the function and if you want to
add a comment, just say that the caller should have a reference on
memcg.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
        struct obj_cgroup *objcg = NULL;
@@ -2908,6 +2916,45 @@ static struct obj_cgroup *__get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
        return objcg;
 }

+static struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+{
+       struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
+
+       if (memcg_kmem_bypass())
+               return NULL;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       objcg = __get_obj_cgroup_from_memcg(memcg);
+       rcu_read_unlock();
+       return objcg;
+}
+
+struct obj_cgroup *get_obj_cgroup_from_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgrp)
Since this function is exposed to other files, it would be nice to
have a comment similar to get_mem_cgroup_from_mm() for this function.
I know other get_obj_cgroup variants do not have such a comment yet
but let's start with this.
+{
+       struct cgroup_subsys_state *css;
+       struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+       struct obj_cgroup *objcg;
+
+       rcu_read_lock();
+       css = rcu_dereference(cgrp->subsys[memory_cgrp_id]);
+       if (!css || !css_tryget_online(css)) {
Any reason to use css_tryget_online() instead of css_tryget()?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help