On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 03:02:09PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static struct pse_control *
+fwnode_find_pse_control(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
+{
+ struct pse_control *psec;
+ struct device_node *np;
+
+ if (is_acpi_node(fwnode))
+ return NULL;
+
+ np = to_of_node(fwnode);
+ if (!np)
+ return NULL;
Doesn't to_of_node() confirm that the fwnode is a DT node? In other
words, isn't the "is_acpi_node()" entirely redundant?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+ psec = of_pse_control_get(np);
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(psec))
+ return NULL;
+
+ return psec;
+}
So fwnode_find_pse_control() returns NULL on error.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ psec = fwnode_find_pse_control(child);
+ if (IS_ERR(psec))
+ return PTR_ERR(psec);
This usage expects it to return an error-pointer.
Clearly, there is some disagreement about what fwnode_find_pse_control()
returns on error.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!