Re: [PATCH 0/6] virtio/vsock: introduce dgrams, sk_buff, and qdisc
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-08-17 17:53:52
Also in:
kvm, linux-hyperv, lkml, virtualization
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-08-17 17:53:52
Also in:
kvm, linux-hyperv, lkml, virtualization
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 11:08:26AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 01:02:52PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:quoted
On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 09:42:51AM +0000, Bobby Eshleman wrote:quoted
quoted
The basic question to answer then is this: with a net device qdisc etc in the picture, how is this different from virtio net then? Why do you still want to use vsock?When using virtio-net, users looking for inter-VM communication are required to setup bridges, TAPs, allocate IP addresses or setup DNS, etc... and then finally when you have a network, you can open a socket on an IP address and port. This is the configuration that vsock avoids. For vsock, we just need a CID and a port, but no network configuration.Surely when you mention DNS you are going overboard? vsock doesn't remove the need for DNS as much as it does not support it.Oops, s/DNS/dhcp.
That too. -- MST