Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 0/3] net: vlan: fix bridge binding behavior and add selftests
From: Sevinj Aghayeva <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-10 15:00:46
Also in:
bridge, lkml
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 10:50 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 10/08/2022 17:42, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:54 AM Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org <mailto:razor@blackwall.org>> wrote: On 10/08/2022 06:11, Sevinj Aghayeva wrote: > When bridge binding is enabled for a vlan interface, it is expected > that the link state of the vlan interface will track the subset of the > ports that are also members of the corresponding vlan, rather than > that of all ports. > > Currently, this feature works as expected when a vlan interface is > created with bridge binding enabled: > > ip link add link br name vlan10 type vlan id 10 protocol 802.1q \ > bridge_binding on > > However, the feature does not work when a vlan interface is created > with bridge binding disabled, and then enabled later: > > ip link add link br name vlan10 type vlan id 10 protocol 802.1q \ > bridge_binding off > ip link set vlan10 type vlan bridge_binding on > > After these two commands, the link state of the vlan interface > continues to track that of all ports, which is inconsistent and > confusing to users. This series fixes this bug and introduces two > tests for the valid behavior. > > Sevinj Aghayeva (3): > net: core: export call_netdevice_notifiers_info > net: 8021q: fix bridge binding behavior for vlan interfaces > selftests: net: tests for bridge binding behavior > > include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 + > net/8021q/vlan.h | 2 +- > net/8021q/vlan_dev.c | 25 ++- > net/core/dev.c | 7 +- > tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile | 1 + > .../selftests/net/bridge_vlan_binding_test.sh | 143 ++++++++++++++++++ > 6 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/net/bridge_vlan_binding_test.sh > Hi, NETDEV_CHANGE event is already propagated when the vlan changes flags, I'm not sure if NETDEV_CHANGE is actually propagated when the vlan changes flags. The two functions in the bridge module that handle NETDEV_CHANGE are br_vlan_port_event and br_vlan_bridge_event. I've installed probes for both, and when I'm changing flags using "sudo ip link set vlan10 type vlan bridge_binding on", I don't see any of those functions getting called, although I do see vlan_dev_change_flags getting called. I think there may be a bug in core/dev.c:__dev_notify_flags.are both vlan and bridge interfaces up? what exactly are you probing for?
I first run the attached pre.sh script that sets up the environment
and creates a vlan interface with bridge binding off. I then start
recording with perf, and here's the list of probes:
$ sudo ./k/linux/tools/perf/perf probe -l
probe:br_vlan_bridge_event (on br_vlan_bridge_event in bridge with event dev)
probe:br_vlan_port_event (on br_vlan_port_event in bridge with event)
probe:br_vlan_set_vlan_dev_state (on br_vlan_set_vlan_dev_state in
bridge with br vlan_dev)
probe:register_vlan_dev (on register_vlan_dev in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_changelink (on vlan_changelink in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_change_flags (on vlan_dev_change_flags in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_fix_features (on vlan_dev_fix_features in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_init (on vlan_dev_init in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_ioctl (on vlan_dev_ioctl in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_open (on vlan_dev_open in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_stop (on vlan_dev_stop in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_dev_uninit (on vlan_dev_uninit in 8021q with dev)
probe:vlan_newlink (on vlan_newlink in 8021q with dev)
I then run the following command to turn the bridge binding flag on:
$ sudo ip link set vlan10 type vlan bridge_binding on
Then I stop the recording and print out the events, and I see this. I
don't see br_vlan_port_event or br_vlan_bridge_event getting called.
ip 5933 [003] 2204.722470:
probe:vlan_changelink: (ffffffffc1042b50) dev="vlan10"
ip 5933 [003] 2204.722476:
probe:vlan_dev_change_flags: (ffffffffc1042600) dev="vlan10"
Am I doing something wrong?
Thanks
I can see the NETDEV_CHANGE event go through when changing the loose binding.
-- Sevinj.Aghayeva