On Mon,  8 Aug 2022 13:47:07 +0300 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

Several of the bindings here had only one
maintainer and history does not always point to a new one (although I did not
perform extensive digging). I added subsystem maintainer, because dtschema
requires such entry. This is not the best choice as simply subsystem maintainer
might not have the actual device (or its datasheets or any interest in it).

However dtschema requires a maintainer. Maybe we could add some
"orphaned" entry in such case?

Integrating it with MAINTAINERS would be another option worth exploring
although slightly tangential.

How do you want this merged? It's all over the place subsystem-wise.