Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] vsock: Reschedule connect_work for O_NONBLOCK connect() requests
From: Peilin Ye <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-05 18:27:33
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 02:42:39PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Thu, Aug 04, 2022 at 04:44:47PM -0700, Peilin Ye wrote:quoted
1. I think the root cause of this memleak is, we keep @connect_work pending, even after the 2nd, blocking request times out (or gets interrupted) and sets sock->state back to SS_UNCONNECTED. @connect_work is effectively no-op when sk->sk_state is TCP_CLOS{E,ING} anyway, so why not we just cancel @connect_work when blocking requests time out or get interrupted? Something like:diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index f04abf662ec6..62628af84164 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c@@ -1402,6 +1402,9 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, lock_sock(sk); if (signal_pending(current)) { + if (cancel_delayed_work(&vsk->connect_work)) + sock_put(sk); + err = sock_intr_errno(timeout); sk->sk_state = sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? TCP_CLOSING : TCP_CLOSE; sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;@@ -1409,6 +1412,9 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, vsock_remove_connected(vsk); goto out_wait; } else if (timeout == 0) { + if (cancel_delayed_work(&vsk->connect_work)) + sock_put(sk); + err = -ETIMEDOUT; sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE; sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED; Then no need to worry about rescheduling @connect_work, and the state machine becomes more accurate. What do you think? I will ask syzbot to test this.It could work, but should we set `sk->sk_err` and call sk_error_report() to wake up thread waiting on poll()? Maybe the previous version is simpler.
Right, I forgot about sk_error_report(). Let us use the simpler version then.
quoted
2. About your suggestion of setting sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED in vsock_connect_timeout(), I think it makes sense. Are you going to send a net-next patch for this?If you have time, feel free to send it. Since it is a fix, I believe you can use the "net" tree. (Also for this patch). Remember to put the "Fixes" tag that should be the same.
Sure, I will send them this week. Thanks! Peilin Ye