Re: [PATCH net-next] mptcp: Fix spelling mistakes and cleanup code
From: Mat Martineau <hidden>
Date: 2022-08-02 22:21:44
Also in:
lkml, mptcp
On Sat, 30 Jul 2022, studentxswpy@163.com wrote:
From: Xie Shaowen <redacted> fix follow spelling misktakes: regarless ==> regardless interaces ==> interfaces Reported-by: Hacash Robot <redacted> Signed-off-by: Xie Shaowen <redacted>
Hello Xie Shaowen - These spelling errors were already fixed in commit d640516a65d8, merged 2022-06-28. Please make sure to work from an up-to-date branch! Thanks for your patch, Mat
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 2 +- net/mptcp/subflow.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c index 7c7395b58944..5bdb559d5242 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c +++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c@@ -1134,7 +1134,7 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_subflow_chk_stale(const struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ss} unlock_sock_fast(ssk, slow); - /* always try to push the pending data regarless of re-injections: + /* always try to push the pending data regardless of re-injections: * we can possibly use backup subflows now, and subflow selection * is cheap under the msk socket lock */diff --git a/net/mptcp/subflow.c b/net/mptcp/subflow.c index af28f3b60389..901c763dcdbb 100644 --- a/net/mptcp/subflow.c +++ b/net/mptcp/subflow.c@@ -1634,7 +1634,7 @@ int mptcp_subflow_create_socket(struct sock *sk, struct socket **new_sock)/* the newly created socket really belongs to the owning MPTCP master * socket, even if for additional subflows the allocation is performed * by a kernel workqueue. Adjust inode references, so that the - * procfs/diag interaces really show this one belonging to the correct + * procfs/diag interfaces really show this one belonging to the correct * user. */ SOCK_INODE(sf)->i_ino = SOCK_INODE(sk->sk_socket)->i_ino; -- 2.25.1
-- Mat Martineau Intel