Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-08-02 11:36:45
Also in:
lkml
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-08-02 11:36:45
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
KSZ9893 family of chips do not support synclko property. So warn about without preventing driver from start. Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de> --- drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c index 71b5349d006a..d3a9836c706f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c@@ -1916,6 +1916,13 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev) dev_err(dev->dev, "inconsistent synclko settings\n"); return -EINVAL; } + + if (dev->chip_id == KSZ9893_CHIP_ID && (dev->synclko_125 || + dev->synclko_disable)) { + dev_warn(dev->dev, "microchip,synclko-125 and microchip,synclko-disable " + "properties are not supported on this chip. " + "Please fix you devicetree.\n");
s/you/your/ Does KSZ8 have a REFCLK output of any sort? If it doesn't, then "microchip,synclko-disable" is kind of supported, right? I wonder what there is to gain by saying that you should remove some device tree properties from non-ksz9477. After all, anyone can add any random properties to a KSZ8 switch OF node and you won't warn about those.
+ } } ret = dsa_register_switch(dev->ds); -- 2.30.2