Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 3 authors, 2022-08-14

Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips

From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-08-02 11:36:45
Also in: lkml

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 03:03:43PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
KSZ9893 family of chips do not support synclko property. So warn about
without preventing driver from start.

Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
index 71b5349d006a..d3a9836c706f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
@@ -1916,6 +1916,13 @@ int ksz_switch_register(struct ksz_device *dev)
 			dev_err(dev->dev, "inconsistent synclko settings\n");
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
+
+		if (dev->chip_id == KSZ9893_CHIP_ID && (dev->synclko_125 ||
+							dev->synclko_disable)) {
+			dev_warn(dev->dev, "microchip,synclko-125 and microchip,synclko-disable "
+				 "properties are not supported on this chip. "
+				 "Please fix you devicetree.\n");
s/you/your/

Does KSZ8 have a REFCLK output of any sort? If it doesn't, then
"microchip,synclko-disable" is kind of supported, right?

I wonder what there is to gain by saying that you should remove some
device tree properties from non-ksz9477. After all, anyone can add any
random properties to a KSZ8 switch OF node and you won't warn about
those.
+		}
 	}
 
 	ret = dsa_register_switch(dev->ds);
-- 
2.30.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help