Thread (42 messages) flat view 42 messages, 5 authors, 2022-09-05

Re: [PATCH 2/2] vDPA: conditionally read fields in virtio-net dev

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-08-19 03:52:55
Also in: kvm, virtualization

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 08:42:32AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 7:20 AM Si-Wei Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted


On 8/17/2022 9:15 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
quoted
在 2022/8/17 18:37, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:43:22PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
quoted
On 8/17/2022 5:39 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 05:13:59PM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
quoted
On 8/17/2022 4:55 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:14:26AM +0800, Zhu, Lingshan wrote:
quoted
Yes it is a little messy, and we can not check _F_VERSION_1
because of
transitional devices, so maybe this is the best we can do for now
I think vhost generally needs an API to declare config space
endian-ness
to kernel. vdpa can reuse that too then.
Yes, I remember you have mentioned some IOCTL to set the endian-ness,
for vDPA, I think only the vendor driver knows the endian,
so we may need a new function vdpa_ops->get_endian().
In the last thread, we say maybe it's better to add a comment for
now.
But if you think we should add a vdpa_ops->get_endian(), I can work
on it for sure!

Thanks
Zhu Lingshan
I think QEMU has to set endian-ness. No one else knows.
Yes, for SW based vhost it is true. But for HW vDPA, only
the device & driver knows the endian, I think we can not
"set" a hardware's endian.
QEMU knows the guest endian-ness and it knows that
device is accessed through the legacy interface.
It can accordingly send endian-ness to the kernel and
kernel can propagate it to the driver.

I wonder if we can simply force LE and then Qemu can do the endian
conversion?
convert from LE for config space fields only, or QEMU has to forcefully
mediate and covert endianness for all device memory access including
even the datapath (fields in descriptor and avail/used rings)?
Former. Actually, I want to force modern devices for vDPA when
developing the vDPA framework. But then we see requirements for
transitional or even legacy (e.g the Ali ENI parent). So it
complicates things a lot.

I think several ideas has been proposed:

1) Your proposal of having a vDPA specific way for
modern/transitional/legacy awareness. This seems very clean since each
transport should have the ability to do that but it still requires
some kind of mediation for the case e.g running BE legacy guest on LE
host.

2) Michael suggests using VHOST_SET_VRING_ENDIAN where it means we
need a new config ops for vDPA bus, but it doesn't solve the issue for
config space (at least from its name). We probably need a new ioctl
for both vring and config space.

or

Yea, like VHOST_SET_CONFIG_ENDIAN.


3) revisit the idea of forcing modern only device which may simplify
things a lot
Problem is vhost needs VHOST_SET_CONFIG_ENDIAN too. it's not
a vdpa specific issue.
which way should we go?
quoted
I hope
it's not the latter, otherwise it loses the point to use vDPA for
datapath acceleration.

Even if its the former, it's a little weird for vendor device to
implement a LE config space with BE ring layout, although still possible...
Right.

Thanks
quoted
-Siwei
quoted
Thanks

quoted
quoted
So if you think we should add a vdpa_ops->get_endian(),
I will drop these comments in the next version of
series, and work on a new patch for get_endian().

Thanks,
Zhu Lingshan
Guests don't get endian-ness from devices so this seems pointless.
  
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help