Re: [PATCH v12 38/40] virtio_net: support rx queue resize
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-07-25 07:29:18
Also in:
bpf, kvm, linux-remoteproc, linux-s390, linux-um, platform-driver-x86, virtualization
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 3:23 PM Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 14:57:11 +0800, Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 2:43 PM Xuan Zhuo [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:25:59 +0800, Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
在 2022/7/20 11:04, Xuan Zhuo 写道:quoted
This patch implements the resize function of the rx queues. Based on this function, it is possible to modify the ring num of the queue. Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index fe4dc43c05a1..1115a8b59a08 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c@@ -278,6 +278,8 @@ struct padded_vnet_hdr { char padding[12]; }; +static void virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(struct virtqueue *vq, void *buf); + static bool is_xdp_frame(void *ptr) { return (unsigned long)ptr & VIRTIO_XDP_FLAG;@@ -1846,6 +1848,26 @@ static netdev_tx_t start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) return NETDEV_TX_OK; } +static int virtnet_rx_resize(struct virtnet_info *vi, + struct receive_queue *rq, u32 ring_num) +{ + int err, qindex; + + qindex = rq - vi->rq; + + napi_disable(&rq->napi);We need to disable refill work as well. So this series might need rebasing on top of https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220704074859.16912-1-jasowang@redhat.com/ (local)I understand that your patch is used to solve the situation where dev is destoryed but refill work is running. And is there such a possibility here?E.g the refill work runs in parallel with this function?napi_disable enables lock-like functionality. So I think it's safe.
Ok, right, since there will be a napi_enable() soon afterwards. So Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Thanks
Thanks.quoted
Thanksquoted
Or is there any other scenario that I'm not expecting? Thanks.quoted
I will send a new version (probably tomorrow). Thanksquoted
+ + err = virtqueue_resize(rq->vq, ring_num, virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf); + if (err) + netdev_err(vi->dev, "resize rx fail: rx queue index: %d err: %d\n", qindex, err); + + if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_KERNEL)) + schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0); + + virtnet_napi_enable(rq->vq, &rq->napi); + return err; +} + /* * Send command via the control virtqueue and check status. Commands * supported by the hypervisor, as indicated by feature bits, should