[PATCH RFC 1/5] net: Add distinct sk_psock field
From: Hawkins Jiawei <hidden>
Date: 2022-07-13 04:47:05
Also in:
linux-cifs, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel-mentees, linux-nfs, linux-nvme
On 4/18/22 18:49, Chuck Lever wrote:quoted
The sk_psock facility populates the sk_user_data field with the address of an extra bit of metadata. User space sockets never populate the sk_user_data field, so this has worked out fine. However, kernel consumers such as the RPC client and server do populate the sk_user_data field. The sk_psock() function cannot tell that the content of sk_user_data does not point to psock metadata, so it will happily return a pointer to something else, cast to a struct sk_psock. Thus kernel consumers and psock currently cannot co-exist. We could educate sk_psock() to return NULL if sk_user_data does not point to a struct sk_psock. However, a more general solution that enables full co-existence psock and other uses of sk_user_data might be more interesting. Move the struct sk_psock address to its own pointer field so that the contents of the sk_user_data field is preserved. Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <redacted> --- include/linux/skmsg.h | 2 +- include/net/sock.h | 4 +++- net/core/skmsg.c | 6 +++--- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> Cheers, Hannes
In Patchwork website, this patch fails the checks on netdev/cc_maintainers. So maybe you need CC folks pointed out by scripts/get_maintainer.pl script, which is suggested by Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref]. What's more, Syskaller reports refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2). In this bug, the problem is that smc and psock, both use sk_user_data field to save their private data. So they will treat field in their own way.
in smc_switch_to_fallback(), and set smc->clcsock->sk_user_data to origin smc in smc_fback_replace_callbacks(). Later, sk_psock_get() will treat the smc->clcsock->sk_user_data as sk_psock type, which triggers the refcnt warning.
I have tested this patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue. For more details, you can check the email [PATCH] smc: fix refcount bug in sk_psock_get (2)