Thread (54 messages) 54 messages, 6 authors, 2022-07-08

Re: [PATCH V3 net-next 1/4] net: bridge: add fdb flag to extent locked port feature

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Date: 2022-07-07 14:08:25
Also in: bridge, linux-kselftest, lkml

On 07/07/2022 00:01, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
On 06/07/2022 23:21, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Jul 06, 2022 at 10:38:04PM +0300, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
[snip]
I already said it's ok to add hard configurable limits if they're done properly performance-wise.
Any distribution can choose to set some default limits after the option exists.
Just fyi, and to avoid duplicate efforts, I already have patches for global and per-port software
fdb limits that I'll polish and submit soon (depending on time availability, of course). If I find
more time I might add per-vlan limits as well to the set. They use embedded netlink attributes
to config and dump, so we can easily extend them later (e.g. different action on limit hit, limit
statistics etc).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help