Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 3 authors, 2022-06-14
STALE1542d

Revision v1 of 4 in this series.

Revisions (4)
  1. v1 current
  2. v2 [diff vs current]
  3. v3 [diff vs current]
  4. v4 [diff vs current]

[PATCH bpf-next 0/2] Align BPF TCP CCs implementing cong_control() with non-BPF CCs

From: Jörn-Thorben Hinz <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-08 17:55:17
Also in: bpf

Hello there,

hope, I’m in the right place with bpf-next. Previous changes to
bpf_tcp_ca.c seemed to have gone here, besides the MAINTAINERS file and
get_maintainer.pl hinting more towards the neighboring net-next.

This small series corrects some inconveniences for a BPF TCP CC that
implements and uses tcp_congestion_ops.cong_control(). Until now, such a
CC did not have all necessary write access to struct sock and
unnecessarily needed to implement cong_avoid().

Jörn-Thorben Hinz (2):
  bpf: Allow a TCP CC to write sk_pacing_rate and sk_pacing_status
  bpf: Require only one of cong_avoid() and cong_control() from a TCP CC

 net/ipv4/bpf_tcp_ca.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

-- 
2.30.2
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help