Re: [PATCH][next] treewide: uapi: Replace zero-length arrays with flexible-array members
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Date: 2022-06-27 19:54:14
Also in:
bpf, dm-devel, dri-devel, intel-gfx, io-uring, kvm, linux-arm-kernel, linux-btrfs, linux-can, linux-fsdevel, linux-hardening, linux-m68k, linux-mips, linux-mmc, linux-perf-users, linux-raid, linux-rdma, linux-s390, linux-scsi, linux-sctp, linux-usb, lkml, lvs-devel, netfilter-devel, nvdimm, target-devel
On Mon, 27 Jun 2022 20:04:32 +0200
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" [off-list ref] wrote:
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare
having a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure.
Kernel code should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these
cases. The older style of one-element or zero-length arrays should
no longer be used[2].
This code was transformed with the help of Coccinelle:
(linux-5.19-rc2$ spatch --jobs $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) --sp-file script.cocci --include-headers --dir . > output.patch)
@@
identifier S, member, array;
type T1, T2;
@@
struct S {
...
T1 member;
T2 array[
- 0
];
};
-fstrict-flex-arrays=3 is coming and we need to land these changes
to prevent issues like these in the short future:
../fs/minix/dir.c:337:3: warning: 'strcpy' will always overflow; destination buffer has size 0,
but the source string has length 2 (including NUL byte) [-Wfortify-source]
strcpy(de3->name, ".");
^
Since these are all [0] to [] changes, the risk to UAPI is nearly zero. If
this breaks anything, we can use a union with a new member name.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.16/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/78
Build-tested-by: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/62b675ec.wKX6AOZ6cbE71vtF%25lkp@intel.com/ (local)
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Thanks this fixes warning with gcc-12 in iproute2.
In function ‘xfrm_algo_parse’,
inlined from ‘xfrm_state_modify.constprop’ at xfrm_state.c:573:5:
xfrm_state.c:162:32: warning: writing 1 byte into a region of size 0 [-Wstringop-overflow=]
162 | buf[j] = val;
| ~~~~~~~^~~~~