Re: [PATCH V6 8/9] virtio: harden vring IRQ
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: 2022-06-17 07:26:37
Also in:
linux-s390, lkml, virtualization
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:36 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 09:24:57AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:38:18AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:49 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 03:40:21PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:28 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 05:14:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 5:08 PM Jason Wang [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:59 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:51:08PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:19 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:07:09PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 01:26:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 1:12 PM Michael S. Tsirkin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:01:19PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
This is a rework on the previous IRQ hardening that is done for virtio-pci where several drawbacks were found and were reverted: 1) try to use IRQF_NO_AUTOEN which is not friendly to affinity managed IRQ that is used by some device such as virtio-blk 2) done only for PCI transport The vq->broken is re-used in this patch for implementing the IRQ hardening. The vq->broken is set to true during both initialization and reset. And the vq->broken is set to false in virtio_device_ready(). Then vring_interrupt() can check and return when vq->broken is true. And in this case, switch to return IRQ_NONE to let the interrupt core aware of such invalid interrupt to prevent IRQ storm. The reason of using a per queue variable instead of a per device one is that we may need it for per queue reset hardening in the future. Note that the hardening is only done for vring interrupt since the config interrupt hardening is already done in commit 22b7050a024d7 ("virtio: defer config changed notifications"). But the method that is used by config interrupt can't be reused by the vring interrupt handler because it uses spinlock to do the synchronization which is expensive. Cc: Thomas Gleixner <redacted> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Cc: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> Cc: Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>Jason, I am really concerned by all the fallout. I propose adding a flag to suppress the hardening - this will be a debugging aid and a work around for users if we find more buggy drivers. suppress_interrupt_hardening ?I can post a patch but I'm afraid if we disable it by default, it won't be used by the users so there's no way for us to receive the bug report. Or we need a plan to enable it by default. It's rc2, how about waiting for 1 and 2 rc? Or it looks better if we simply warn instead of disable it by default. ThanksI meant more like a flag in struct virtio_driver. For now, could you audit all drivers which don't call _ready? I found 5 of these: drivers/bluetooth/virtio_bt.cThis driver seems to be fine, it doesn't use the device/vq in its probe().But it calls hci_register_dev and that in turn queues all kind of work. Also, can linux start using the device immediately after it's registered?So I think the driver is allowed to queue before DRIVER_OK.it's not allowed to kickYes.quoted
quoted
If yes, the only side effect is the delay of the tx interrupt after DRIVER_OK for a well behaved device.your patches drop the interrupt though, it won't be just delayed.For a well behaved device, it can only trigger the interrupt after DRIVER_OK. So for virtio bt, it works like: 1) driver queue buffer and kick 2) driver set DRIVER_OK 3) device start to process the buffer 4) device send an notification The only risk is that the virtqueue could be filled before DRIVER_OK, or anything I missed?btw, hci has an open and close method and we do rx refill in hdev->open, so we're probably fine here. ThanksSounds good. Now to audit the rest of them from this POV ;)Adding maintainers.quoted
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.cIt looks to me the device could be used immediately after i2c_add_adapter() return. So we probably need to add virtio_device_ready() before that. Fortunately, there's no rx vq in i2c and the callback looks safe if the callback is called before the i2c registration and after virtio_device_ready().quoted
drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.cA networking device, RX is backed by vringh so we don't need to refill. TX is backed by virtio and is available until ndo_open. So it's fine to let the core to set DRIVER_OK after probe().quoted
drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.cIt doesn't use interrupt so far, so it has nothing to do with the IRQ hardening. But the device could be used by the subsystem immediately after nvdimm_pmem_region_create(), this means the flush could be issued before DRIVER_OK. We need virtio_device_ready() before. We don't have a RX virtqueue and the callback looks safe if the callback is called after virtio_device_ready() but before the nvdimm region creating. And it looks to me there's a race between the assignment of provider_data and virtio_pmem_flush(). If the flush was issued before the assignment we will end up with a NULL pointer dereference. This is something we need to fix.quoted
arm_scmiIt looks to me the singleton device could be used by SCMI immediately after /* Ensure initialized scmi_vdev is visible */ smp_store_mb(scmi_vdev, vdev); So we probably need to do virtio_device_ready() before that. It has an optional rx queue but the filling is done after the above assignment, so it's safe. And the callback looks safe is a callback is triggered after virtio_device_ready() buy before the above assignment.quoted
virtio_rpmsg_bus.cThis is somehow more complicated. It has an rx queue, the rx filling is done before virtio_device_ready() but the kick is done after. And it looks to me the device could be used by subsystem immediately rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() returns. This means, if we do virtio_device_ready() after rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), we may get kick before DRIVER_OK. If we do virtio_device_ready() before rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev(), there's a race between the callbacks and rpmsg_virtio_add_ctrl_dev() that could be exploited. It requires more thoughts. ThanksI think at this point let's do it before so we at least do not get a regression with your patches, add a big comment and work on fixing properly in the next Linux version. Do you think you can commit to a full fix in the next linux version?I think it should be ok. If I understand you correctly, you meant to disable the hardening in this release? (Actually, my understanding is that since we are developing mainline instead of a downstream version with a hardening features, bug reports are somehow expected, especially consider most of the bugs are not related to hardening itself)Absolutely. Question is do you think we can fix everything by the release?Probably not, I'm auditing all the virtio drivers and it seems we have many issues: 1) race between subsystem registration/use and virtio_device_ready() 2) race between notifications and subsystem registerstiation/use And it looks to me even virtio-net has this race.Interesting. How does it look for virtio-net?
Will post a patch soon.
quoted
So I think I will post a patch to disable this like below for this release.However please do post patches that add device_ready as appropriate. This is basic spec compliance.
Working on this.
Also do you think we should do a full revert? Maybe a Kconfig option is ok for now.
Yes, Kconfig should be fine. Patch will be posted soon. Thanks
quoted
quoted
At least for rpmsg we don't seem to have a handle on it yet.Yes.quoted
quoted
Thanksdiff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 13a7348cedff..7ef3115efbad 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed( vq->we_own_ring = true; vq->notify = notify; vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers; - vq->broken = true; + vq->broken = false; vq->last_used_idx = 0; vq->event_triggered = false; vq->num_added = 0;and drop it on reset?Right. Thanksquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
If not, we need to clarify it in the spec and call virtio_device_ready() before subsystem registration.hmm, i don't get what we need to clarifyE.g the driver is not allowed to kick or after DRIVER_OK should the device only process the buffer after a kick after DRIVER_OK (I think no)?quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.cIt calles virtio_device_ready() in virtio_gpu_init(), and it looks to me the code is correct.OK.quoted
quoted
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.cThe above looks fine and we have three more: arm_scmi: probe() doesn't use vq mac80211_hwsim.c: doesn't use vq (only fill rx), but it kicks the rx, it looks to me we need a device_ready before the kick. virtio_rpmsg_bus.c: doesn't use vq I will post a patch for mac80211_hwsim.c. ThanksSame comments for all of the above. Might linux not start using the device once it's registered?It depends on the specific subsystem. For the subsystem that can't use the device immediately, calling virtio_device_ready() after the subsystem's registration should be fine. E.g for the networking subsystem, the TX won't happen if ndo_open() is not called, calling virtio_device_ready() after netdev_register() seems to be fine.exactlyquoted
For the subsystem that can use the device immediately, if the subsystem does not depend on the result of a request in the probe to proceed, we are still fine. Since those requests will be proceed after DRIVER_OK.Well first won't driver code normally kick as well?Kick itself is not blocked.quoted
And without kick, won't everything just be blocked?It depends on the subsystem. E.g driver can choose to use a callback instead of polling the used buffer in the probe.quoted
quoted
For the rest we need to do virtio_device_ready() before registration. ThanksThen we can get an interrupt for an unregistered device.It depends on the device. For the device that doesn't have an rx queue (or device to driver queue), we are fine: E.g in virtio-blk: virtio_device_ready(vdev); err = device_add_disk(&vdev->dev, vblk->disk, virtblk_attr_groups); if (err) goto out_cleanup_disk; Thanksquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
--- drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c | 4 ++++ drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c | 5 +++++ drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c | 5 +++++ drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 11 +++++++---- include/linux/virtio_config.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 6 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c index c188e4f20ca3..97e51c34e6cf 100644 --- a/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c +++ b/drivers/s390/virtio/virtio_ccw.c@@ -971,6 +971,10 @@ static void virtio_ccw_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status) ccw->flags = 0; ccw->count = sizeof(status); ccw->cda = (__u32)(unsigned long)&vcdev->dma_area->status; + /* We use ssch for setting the status which is a serializing + * instruction that guarantees the memory writes have + * completed before ssch. + */ ret = ccw_io_helper(vcdev, ccw, VIRTIO_CCW_DOING_WRITE_STATUS); /* Write failed? We assume status is unchanged. */ if (ret)diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c index aa1eb5132767..95fac4c97c8b 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c@@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static int virtio_features_ok(struct virtio_device *dev) * */ void virtio_reset_device(struct virtio_device *dev) { + /* + * The below virtio_synchronize_cbs() guarantees that any + * interrupt for this line arriving after + * virtio_synchronize_vqs() has completed is guaranteed to see + * vq->broken as true. + */ + virtio_break_device(dev);So make this conditionalquoted
+ virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev); + dev->config->reset(dev); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtio_reset_device);@@ -428,6 +437,9 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) dev->config_enabled = false; dev->config_change_pending = false; + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs); + spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock); + /* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous * driver messed it up. This also tests that code path a little. */ virtio_reset_device(dev);@@ -435,9 +447,6 @@ int register_virtio_device(struct virtio_device *dev) /* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */ virtio_add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->vqs); - spin_lock_init(&dev->vqs_list_lock); - /* * device_add() causes the bus infrastructure to look for a matching * driver.diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c index c9699a59f93c..f9a36bc7ac27 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_mmio.c@@ -253,6 +253,11 @@ static void vm_set_status(struct virtio_device *vdev, u8 status) /* We should never be setting status to 0. */ BUG_ON(status == 0); + /* + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed + * before writing to the MMIO region. + */ writel(status, vm_dev->base + VIRTIO_MMIO_STATUS); }diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c index 4093f9cca7a6..a0fa14f28a7f 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_modern_dev.c@@ -467,6 +467,11 @@ void vp_modern_set_status(struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev, { struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = mdev->common; + /* + * Per memory-barriers.txt, wmb() is not needed to guarantee + * that the the cache coherent memory writes have completed + * before writing to the MMIO region. + */ vp_iowrite8(status, &cfg->device_status); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vp_modern_set_status);diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c index 9c231e1fded7..13a7348cedff 100644 --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c@@ -1688,7 +1688,7 @@ static struct virtqueue *vring_create_virtqueue_packed( vq->we_own_ring = true; vq->notify = notify; vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers; - vq->broken = false; + vq->broken = true; vq->last_used_idx = 0; vq->event_triggered = false; vq->num_added = 0;and make this conditionalquoted
@@ -2134,8 +2134,11 @@ irqreturn_t vring_interrupt(int irq, void *_vq) return IRQ_NONE; } - if (unlikely(vq->broken)) - return IRQ_HANDLED; + if (unlikely(vq->broken)) { + dev_warn_once(&vq->vq.vdev->dev, + "virtio vring IRQ raised before DRIVER_OK"); + return IRQ_NONE; + } /* Just a hint for performance: so it's ok that this can be racy! */ if (vq->event)@@ -2177,7 +2180,7 @@ struct virtqueue *__vring_new_virtqueue(unsigned int index, vq->we_own_ring = false; vq->notify = notify; vq->weak_barriers = weak_barriers; - vq->broken = false; + vq->broken = true; vq->last_used_idx = 0; vq->event_triggered = false; vq->num_added = 0;and make this conditionalquoted
diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_config.h b/include/linux/virtio_config.h index 25be018810a7..d4edfd7d91bb 100644 --- a/include/linux/virtio_config.h +++ b/include/linux/virtio_config.h@@ -256,6 +256,26 @@ void virtio_device_ready(struct virtio_device *dev) unsigned status = dev->config->get_status(dev); BUG_ON(status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK); + + /* + * The virtio_synchronize_cbs() makes sure vring_interrupt() + * will see the driver specific setup if it sees vq->broken + * as false (even if the notifications come before DRIVER_OK). + */ + virtio_synchronize_cbs(dev); + __virtio_unbreak_device(dev); + /* + * The transport should ensure the visibility of vq->broken + * before setting DRIVER_OK. See the comments for the transport + * specific set_status() method. + * + * A well behaved device will only notify a virtqueue after + * DRIVER_OK, this means the device should "see" the coherenct + * memory write that set vq->broken as false which is done by + * the driver when it sees DRIVER_OK, then the following + * driver's vring_interrupt() will see vq->broken as false so + * we won't lose any notification. + */ dev->config->set_status(dev, status | VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK); } --2.25.1