Re: Fwd: question on driver for phy dp83td510e
From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Date: 2022-06-20 09:30:55
Hi Ernesto, Cc-ing: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 10:45:59AM +0200, Ernesto Vigano' wrote:
I see that some weeks ago a driver for phy dp83td510e from TI (https://www.ti.com/product/DP83TD510E). I see that it's really different from the Linux driver supplied by TI on its official repo https://git.ti.com/gitweb?p=ti-analog-linux-kernel/dmurphy-analog.git;a=commit;h=fefa908e4e3262455a0cec08f3bb7161d7792d02 As an example, TI writes some undocumented register for version 1.0 of the PHY.
I do not have version 1.0 PHY. May be it is presilicon FPGA version of the devices.
Should I forget about the TI driver?
Yes. If you have some issue, please report them of send patches, against mainline driver.
Or is there something that should be integrated in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/phy/dp83td510.c ?
If it is fixing something, then yes. Regards, Oleksij -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |