Re: [PATCH] ax25: use GFP_KERNEL over GFP_ATOMIC where possible
From: Dan Carpenter <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-06 11:51:24
Also in:
linux-hams
On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 07:21:38AM -0400, Peter Lafreniere wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
net/ax25/ax25_dev.c | 4 ++-- net/ax25/ax25_route.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c index d2a244e1c260..b264904980a8 100644 --- a/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c +++ b/net/ax25/ax25_dev.c@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev) { ax25_dev *ax25_dev; - if ((ax25_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ax25_dev), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) { + if ((ax25_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ax25_dev), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { printk(KERN_ERR "AX.25: ax25_dev_device_up - out of memory\n"); return; }@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ void ax25_dev_device_up(struct net_device *dev) refcount_set(&ax25_dev->refcount, 1); dev->ax25_ptr = ax25_dev; ax25_dev->dev = dev; - dev_hold_track(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC); + dev_hold_track(dev, &ax25_dev->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL); ax25_dev->forward = NULL; ax25_dev->values[AX25_VALUES_IPDEFMODE] = AX25_DEF_IPDEFMODE;
These two are fine.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_route.c b/net/ax25/ax25_route.c index b7c4d656a94b..c77b848ccfc7 100644 --- a/net/ax25/ax25_route.c +++ b/net/ax25/ax25_route.c@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(struct ax25_routes_struct *route) kfree(ax25_rt->digipeat); ax25_rt->digipeat = NULL; if (route->digi_count != 0) { - if ((ax25_rt->digipeat = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) { + if ((ax25_rt->digipeat = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_digi), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
This write lock means it has to be GFP_ATOMIC.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); return -ENOMEM;@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static int __must_check ax25_rt_add(struct ax25_routes_struct *route) ax25_rt = ax25_rt->next; } - if ((ax25_rt = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_route), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL) { + if ((ax25_rt = kmalloc(sizeof(ax25_route), GFP_KERNEL)) == NULL) { write_unlock_bh(&ax25_route_lock);
This change is buggy as well.
ax25_dev_put(ax25_dev); return -ENOMEM;
regards, dan carpenter