Thread (54 messages) 54 messages, 5 authors, 2022-05-31

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 03/11] bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor

From: Martin KaFai Lau <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-24 05:57:46
Also in: bpf

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 07:15:03PM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
quoted
quoted
+             return;
+
+     WARN_ON_ONCE(__bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(&shim_link->tramp_link, shim_link->tr));
+     kfree(shim_link);
How about shim_link->tramp_link.link.prog, is the prog freed ?

Considering the bpf_link_put() does bpf_prog_put(link->prog).
Is there a reason the bpf_link_put() not used and needs to
manage its own shim_link->refcnt here ?
Good catch, I've missed the bpf_prog_put(link->prog) part. Let me see
if I can use the link's refcnt, it seems like I can define my own
link->ops->dealloc to call __bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog and the rest
will be taken care of.
From looking at bpf_link_free(), link->ops->release may be a better one
because the link->ops->release() will still need to use the shim_prog
(e.g. shim_prog->aux->cgroup_atype).
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help