On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 6:00 AM Al Viro [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 04:44:19AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <redacted>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
and this is stable material I guess.
It is, except that commit message ought to be cleaned up. Something
along the lines of
----
Fix double fget() in vhost_net_set_backend()
Descriptor table is a shared resource; two fget() on the same descriptor
may return different struct file references. get_tap_ptr_ring() is
called after we'd found (and pinned) the socket we'll be using and it
tries to find the private tun/tap data structures associated with it.
Redoing the lookup by the same file descriptor we'd used to get the
socket is racy - we need to same struct file.
Thanks to Jason for spotting a braino in the original variant of patch -
I'd missed the use of fd == -1 for disabling backend, and in that case
we can end up with sock == NULL and sock != oldsock.
----
Does the above sound sane for commit message?
Yes.
And which tree would you
prefer it to go through? I can take it in vfs.git#fixes, or you could
take it into your tree...
Consider Michael gave an ack, it would be fine if you want to take via
your tree.
Thanks