Re: [RFC,net-next,x86 0/6] Nontemporal copies in unix socket write path
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-05-12 23:13:04
Also in:
lkml
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-05-12 23:13:04
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 12 May 2022 15:53:05 -0700 Joe Damato wrote:
1. Do you have any strong opinions on the sendmsg flag vs a socket option?
It sounded like you want to mix nt and non-nt on a single socket hence the flag was a requirement. socket option is better because we can have many more of those than there are bits for flags, obviously.
2. If I can think of a way to avoid the indirect calls, do you think this
series is ready for a v1? I'm not sure if there's anything major that
needs to be addressed aside from the indirect calls.Nothing comes to mind, seems pretty straightforward to me.