Re:Re: Re: [PATCH] usb/peak_usb: cleanup code
From: z <hidden>
Date: 2022-05-11 08:48:31
Also in:
linux-can, lkml
At 2022-05-11 16:28:26, "Vincent MAILHOL" [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed. 11 May 2022 at 16:11, z [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
At 2022-05-11 14:44:50, "Marc Kleine-Budde" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On 10.05.2022 23:38:38, Bernard Zhao wrote:quoted
The variable fi and bi only used in branch if (!dev->prev_siblings) , fi & bi not kmalloc in else branch, so move kfree into branch if (!dev->prev_siblings),this change is to cleanup the code a bit.Please move the variable declaration into that scope, too. Adjust the error handling accordingly.Hi Marc: I am not sure if there is some gap. If we move the variable declaration into that scope, then each error branch has to do the kfree job, like: if (err) { dev_err(dev->netdev->dev.parent, "unable to read %s firmware info (err %d)\n", pcan_usb_pro.name, err); kfree(bi); kfree(fi); kfree(usb_if); return err; } I am not sure if this looks a little less clear? Thanks!A cleaner way would be to move all the content of the if (!dev->prev_siblings) to a new function.
Hi Vincent Mailhol: Got it. This seems to be a good idea, i would resubmit one patch V2. Thanks! BR//Bernard
Yours sincerely, Vincent Mailhol