[PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 01/11] bpftool: use a local copy of perf_event to fix accessing ::bpf_cookie · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Michal Suchánek <hidden> · 2023-04-14
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> · 2023-04-14
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Michal Suchánek <hidden> · 2023-04-14
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Andrii Nakryiko <hidden> · 2023-04-20
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Michal Suchánek <hidden> · 2023-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Quentin Monnet <hidden> · 2023-05-03
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Andrii Nakryiko <hidden> · 2023-05-03
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Michal Suchánek <hidden> · 2023-05-04
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 02/11] bpftool: define a local bpf_perf_link to fix accessing its fields · Yonghong Song <hidden> · 2023-05-04
[PATCH v2 bpf 03/11] bpftool: use a local bpf_perf_event_value to fix accessing its fields · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 03/11] bpftool: use a local bpf_perf_event_value to fix accessing its fields · Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> · 2023-06-06
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 03/11] bpftool: use a local bpf_perf_event_value to fix accessing its fields · Quentin Monnet <hidden> · 2023-06-07
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 03/11] bpftool: use a local bpf_perf_event_value to fix accessing its fields · Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com> · 2023-06-07
[PATCH v2 bpf 04/11] bpftool: fix fcntl.h include · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 08/11] samples/bpf: fix false-positive right-shift underflow warnings · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 09/11] samples/bpf: fix include order for non-Glibc environments · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 10/11] samples/bpf: fix -Wsequence-point · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 11/11] samples/bpf: xdpsock: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Alexei Starovoitov <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-05-03
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) · Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org> · 2022-05-04
[PATCH v2 bpf 06/11] samples/bpf: use host bpftool to generate vmlinux.h, not target · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 07/11] samples/bpf: fix uin64_t format literals · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
RE: [PATCH v2 bpf 07/11] samples/bpf: fix uin64_t format literals · David Laight <hidden> · 2022-04-21
Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 07/11] samples/bpf: fix uin64_t format literals · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21
[PATCH v2 bpf 05/11] samples/bpf: add 'asm/mach-generic' include path for every MIPS · Alexander Lobakin <hidden> · 2022-04-21

Re: [PATCH v2 bpf 00/11] bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al)

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-04-21 10:53:16
Also in: bpf, lkml

Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 5:38 PM Alexander Lobakin [off-list ref] wrote:

Again?

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: ProtonMail

wcFMA165ASBBe6s8AQ/8C9y4TqXgASA5xBT7UIf2GyTQRjKWcy/6kT1dkjkF
FldAOhehhgLYjLJzNAIkecOQfz/XNapW3GdrQDq11pq9Bzs1SJJekGXlHVIW

Sorry I'm tossing the series out of patchwork.

FWIW I'm not seeing this in the version I pulled from Lore. So maybe
it's something ProtonMail does on a per-recipient basis? Still really
weird to do behind the scenes, though... :/

-Toke

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help