Re: [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks

[PATCH net v2 00/14] docs: update and move the netdev-FAQ · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
[PATCH net v2 01/14] docs: netdev: replace references to old archives · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 01/14] docs: netdev: replace references to old archives · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 02/14] docs: netdev: minor reword · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 02/14] docs: netdev: minor reword · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 04/14] docs: netdev: turn the net-next closed into a Warning · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 04/14] docs: netdev: turn the net-next closed into a Warning · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
Re: [PATCH net v2 07/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'Under review' question · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 03/14] docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 03/14] docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 03/14] docs: netdev: move the patch marking section up · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 08/14] docs: netdev: rephrase the 'should I update patchwork' question · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
[PATCH net v2 05/14] docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 05/14] docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time · Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 05/14] docs: netdev: note that RFC postings are allowed any time · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 11/14] docs: netdev: add missing back ticks · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 06/14] docs: netdev: shorten the name and mention msgid for patch status · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 06/14] docs: netdev: shorten the name and mention msgid for patch status · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 10/14] docs: netdev: make the testing requirement more stringent · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 10/14] docs: netdev: make the testing requirement more stringent · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 14/14] docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 14/14] docs: netdev: move the netdev-FAQ to the process pages · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 09/14] docs: netdev: add a question about re-posting frequency · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 09/14] docs: netdev: add a question about re-posting frequency · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 13/14] docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 13/14] docs: netdev: broaden the new vs old code formatting guidelines · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30
[PATCH net v2 12/14] docs: netdev: call out the merge window in tag checking · Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> · 2022-03-29
Re: [PATCH net v2 12/14] docs: netdev: call out the merge window in tag checking · Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> · 2022-03-30

From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-03-30 03:34:30
Also in: bpf, linux-doc


On 3/28/2022 10:08 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

I think double back ticks are more correct. Add where they are missing.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
-- 
Florian

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help