RE: [PATCH] fbdev: defio: fix the pagelist corruption
From: Liu, Chuansheng <hidden>
Date: 2022-03-31 08:40:04
Also in:
bpf, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-mm
Hi Paul,
-----Original Message----- From: dri-devel <redacted> On Behalf Of Paul Menzel Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 4:22 PM To: Liu, Chuansheng <redacted> Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org; Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>; akpm@linux-foundation.org; daniel@iogearbox.net; linux-mm@kvack.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; deller@gmx.de; x86@kernel.org; ast@kernel.org; dri- devel@lists.freedesktop.org; andrii@kernel.org; Song Liu [off-list ref]; Ingo Molnar [off-list ref]; Thomas Gleixner [off-list ref]; tzimmermann@suse.de; Borislav Petkov [off-list ref]; bpf@vger.kernel.org; Edgecombe, Rick P [off-list ref]; kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbdev: defio: fix the pagelist corruption Dear Chuansheng, Am 31.03.22 um 02:06 schrieb Liu, Chuansheng:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Menzel <redacted> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2022 12:47 AM[…]quoted
quoted
Am 29.03.22 um 01:58 schrieb Liu, Chuansheng:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message----- From: Paul Menzel Sent: Monday, March 28, 2022 2:15 PMquoted
quoted
Am 28.03.22 um 02:58 schrieb Liu, Chuansheng:quoted
quoted
-----Original Message-----quoted
quoted
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2022 4:11 PMquoted
quoted
Am 17.03.22 um 06:46 schrieb Chuansheng Liu:quoted
Easily hit the below list corruption: == list_add corruption. prev->next should be next (ffffffffc0ceb090), but was ffffec604507edc8. (prev=ffffec604507edc8). WARNING: CPU: 65 PID: 3959 at lib/list_debug.c:26 __list_add_valid+0x53/0x80 CPU: 65 PID: 3959 Comm: fbdev Tainted: G U RIP: 0010:__list_add_valid+0x53/0x80 Call Trace: <TASK> fb_deferred_io_mkwrite+0xea/0x150 do_page_mkwrite+0x57/0xc0 do_wp_page+0x278/0x2f0 __handle_mm_fault+0xdc2/0x1590 handle_mm_fault+0xdd/0x2c0 do_user_addr_fault+0x1d3/0x650 exc_page_fault+0x77/0x180 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x8/0x30 asm_exc_page_fault+0x1e/0x30 RIP: 0033:0x7fd98fc8fad1 == Figure out the race happens when one process is adding &page->lruintoquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
the pagelist tail in fb_deferred_io_mkwrite(), another process is re-initializing the same &page->lru in fb_deferred_io_fault(), which is not protected by the lock. This fix is to init all the page lists one time during initialization, it not only fixes the list corruption, but also avoids INIT_LIST_HEAD() redundantly. Fixes: 105a940416fc ("fbdev/defio: Early-out if page is alreadyenlisted")quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <redacted> --- drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.cb/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.cquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
index 98b0f23bf5e2..eafb66ca4f28 100644--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_defio.c@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ static vm_fault_t fb_deferred_io_fault(structvm_fault *vmf)quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
printk(KERN_ERR "no mapping available\n"); BUG_ON(!page->mapping); - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru); page->index = vmf->pgoff; vmf->page = page;@@ -220,6 +219,8 @@ static void fb_deferred_io_work(structwork_struct *work)quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
void fb_deferred_io_init(struct fb_info *info) { struct fb_deferred_io *fbdefio = info->fbdefio; + struct page *page; + int i; BUG_ON(!fbdefio); mutex_init(&fbdefio->lock);@@ -227,6 +228,12 @@ void fb_deferred_io_init(struct fb_info *info) INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fbdefio->pagelist); if (fbdefio->delay == 0) /* set a default of 1 s */ fbdefio->delay = HZ; + + /* initialize all the page lists one time */ + for (i = 0; i < info->fix.smem_len; i += PAGE_SIZE) { + page = fb_deferred_io_page(info, i); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru); + } } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fb_deferred_io_init);Applying your patch on top of current Linus’ master branch, tty0 is unusable and looks frozen. Sometimes network card still works,sometimesquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
not.I don't see how the patch would cause below BUG call stack, need sometime toquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
debug. Just few comments: 1. Will the system work well without this patch?Yes, the framebuffer works well without the patch.quoted
2. When you are sure the patch causes the regression you saw, please getfreequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
to submit one reverted patch, thanks : ) I think you for patch wasn’t submitted yet – at least not pulled by Linus.The patch has been in drm-tip, could you have a try with the latest drm-tipto seequoted
quoted
quoted
if the Framebuffer works well, in that case, we could revert it in drm-tip then.With drm-tip (drm-tip: 2022y-03m-29d-13h-14m-35s UTC integration manifest) everything works fine. (I had to disable amdgpu driver, as it failed to build.) Is anyone able to explain that?My patch is for fixing another patch which is in the drm-tip at least,The referenced commit 105a940416fc in the Fixes tag is also in Linus’ master branch.quoted
so I assume applying my patch into Linus tree directly is not completely proper. That's my intention of asking your help for retesting drm-tip.If there were such a relation, that would need to be documented in the commit message.
You should have seen it : )
quoted
You mean everything working fine means another issue you hit is also gone?No, I just mean the hang when applying your patch. Anyway, after figuring out, that drm-tip, is actually not behind Linus’ master branch, I tried to figure out the differences, and it turns out it’s also related to commit fac54e2bfb5b (x86/Kconfig: Select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC with HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMAP) [1], which is in Linus’ master branch, but not drm-tip. Note, I am using a 32-bit user space and a 64-bit Linux kernel. Reverting commit fac54e2bfb5b, and having your patch a applied, the hang is gone.
Good to know you have figured it out, and the issue you hit is not related to my patch : )
I am adding the people involved in the other discussion to make them aware of this failure case. Kind regards, Paul [1]: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/regzbot/mainline/