Thread (39 messages) 39 messages, 5 authors, 2023-01-09

Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/15] net: bridge: Multiple Spanning Trees

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@blackwall.org>
Date: 2022-03-17 09:56:43
Also in: bridge, lkml

On 17/03/2022 11:50, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 11:00, Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 16/03/2022 17:08, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
quoted
The bridge has had per-VLAN STP support for a while now, since:

https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20200124114022.10883-1-nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com/ (local)

The current implementation has some problems:

- The mapping from VLAN to STP state is fixed as 1:1, i.e. each VLAN
  is managed independently. This is awkward from an MSTP (802.1Q-2018,
  Clause 13.5) point of view, where the model is that multiple VLANs
  are grouped into MST instances.

  Because of the way that the standard is written, presumably, this is
  also reflected in hardware implementations. It is not uncommon for a
  switch to support the full 4k range of VIDs, but that the pool of
  MST instances is much smaller. Some examples:

  Marvell LinkStreet (mv88e6xxx): 4k VLANs, but only 64 MSTIs
  Marvell Prestera: 4k VLANs, but only 128 MSTIs
  Microchip SparX-5i: 4k VLANs, but only 128 MSTIs

- By default, the feature is enabled, and there is no way to disable
  it. This makes it hard to add offloading in a backwards compatible
  way, since any underlying switchdevs have no way to refuse the
  function if the hardware does not support it

- The port-global STP state has precedence over per-VLAN states. In
  MSTP, as far as I understand it, all VLANs will use the common
  spanning tree (CST) by default - through traffic engineering you can
  then optimize your network to group subsets of VLANs to use
  different trees (MSTI). To my understanding, the way this is
  typically managed in silicon is roughly:

  Incoming packet:
  .----.----.--------------.----.-------------
  | DA | SA | 802.1Q VID=X | ET | Payload ...
  '----'----'--------------'----'-------------
                        |
                        '->|\     .----------------------------.
                           | +--> | VID | Members | ... | MSTI |
                   PVID -->|/     |-----|---------|-----|------|
                                  |   1 | 0001001 | ... |    0 |
                                  |   2 | 0001010 | ... |   10 |
                                  |   3 | 0001100 | ... |   10 |
                                  '----------------------------'
                                                             |
                               .-----------------------------'
                               |  .------------------------.
                               '->| MSTI | Fwding | Lrning |
                                  |------|--------|--------|
                                  |    0 | 111110 | 111110 |
                                  |   10 | 110111 | 110111 |
                                  '------------------------'

  What this is trying to show is that the STP state (whether MSTP is
  used, or ye olde STP) is always accessed via the VLAN table. If STP
  is running, all MSTI pointers in that table will reference the same
  index in the STP stable - if MSTP is running, some VLANs may point
  to other trees (like in this example).

  The fact that in the Linux bridge, the global state (think: index 0
  in most hardware implementations) is supposed to override the
  per-VLAN state, is very awkward to offload. In effect, this means
  that when the global state changes to blocking, drivers will have to
  iterate over all MSTIs in use, and alter them all to match. This
  also means that you have to cache whether the hardware state is
  currently tracking the global state or the per-VLAN state. In the
  first case, you also have to cache the per-VLAN state so that you
  can restore it if the global state transitions back to forwarding.

This series adds a new mst_enable bridge setting (as suggested by Nik)
that can only be changed when no VLANs are configured on the
bridge. Enabling this mode has the following effect:

- The port-global STP state is used to represent the CST (Common
  Spanning Tree) (1/15)

- Ingress STP filtering is deferred until the frame's VLAN has been
  resolved (1/15)

- The preexisting per-VLAN states can no longer be controlled directly
  (1/15). They are instead placed under the MST module's control,
  which is managed using a new netlink interface (described in 3/15)

- VLANs can br mapped to MSTIs in an arbitrary M:N fashion, using a
  new global VLAN option (2/15)

Switchdev notifications are added so that a driver can track:
- MST enabled state
- VID to MSTI mappings
- MST port states

An offloading implementation is this provided for mv88e6xxx.

A proposal for the corresponding iproute2 interface is available here:

https://github.com/wkz/iproute2/tree/mst
Hi Tobias,
One major missing thing is the selftests for this new feature. Do you
have a plan to upstream them?
100% agree. I have an internal test that I plan to adapt to run as a
kselftest. There's a bootstrapping problem here though. I can't send the
iproute2 series until the kernel support is merged - and until I know
how the iproute2 support ends up looking I can't add a kselftest.
That's ok, some people choose to send the iproute2 with the set, others
send the iproute2 patches separately and add selftests after those are
accepted (that's my personal preference for the same reasons above).
Personally I don't mind either way as long as the tests end up materializing. :)

Just in case you've missed it - most of the bridge tests reside in
tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding.
Ideally, tools/iproute2 would be a thing in the kernel. Then you could
send the entire implementation as one series. I'm sure that's probably
been discussed many times already, but my Google-fu fails me.
Cheers,
 Nik
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help