Re: [RFC PATCH v4 02/15] landlock: filesystem access mask helpers
From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Date: 2022-03-15 17:48:02
Also in:
linux-security-module, netfilter-devel
This patch should be squashed with the previous one. They both refactor FS access masks in a complementary way. On 09/03/2022 14:44, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
This patch adds filesystem helper functions to set and get filesystem mask. Also the modification adds a helper structure landlock_access_mask to support managing multiple access mask. Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <redacted> --- Changes since v3: * Split commit. * Add get_mask, set_mask helpers for filesystem. * Add new struct landlock_access_mask. --- security/landlock/fs.c | 4 ++-- security/landlock/ruleset.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- security/landlock/ruleset.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- security/landlock/syscalls.c | 9 ++++++--- 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c index d727bdab7840..97f5c455f5a7 100644 --- a/security/landlock/fs.c +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ int landlock_append_fs_rule(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset, return -EINVAL; /* Transforms relative access rights to absolute ones. */ - access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~ruleset->access_masks[0]; + access_rights |= LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS & ~landlock_get_fs_access_mask(ruleset, 0); object = get_inode_object(d_backing_inode(path->dentry)); if (IS_ERR(object)) return PTR_ERR(object);@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int check_access_path(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain, /* Saves all layers handling a subset of requested accesses. */ layer_mask = 0; for (i = 0; i < domain->num_layers; i++) { - if (domain->access_masks[i] & access_request) + if (landlock_get_fs_access_mask(domain, i) & access_request) layer_mask |= BIT_ULL(i); } /* An access request not handled by the domain is allowed. */diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c index 78341a0538de..a6212b752549 100644 --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c@@ -44,16 +44,30 @@ static struct landlock_ruleset *create_ruleset(const u32 num_layers) return new_ruleset; } -struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask) +/* A helper function to set a filesystem mask */ +void landlock_set_fs_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset,
struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset Please use const as much as possible even in function arguments: e.g. access_masks_set, mask_level…
+ const struct landlock_access_mask *access_mask_set,
nit: no need for "_set" suffix. Why do you need a struct landlock_access_mask and not just u16 (which will probably become a subset of access_mask_t, see [1])? landlock_create_ruleset() could just take two masks as argument instead. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220221212522.320243-2-mic@digikod.net/ (local)
+ u16 mask_level)
+{
+ ruleset->access_masks[mask_level] = access_mask_set->fs;
+}
+
+/* A helper function to get a filesystem mask */
+u32 landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset, u16 mask_level)
+{
+ return ruleset->access_masks[mask_level];
+}You can move these two helpers to ruleset.h and make them static inline.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ +struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const struct landlock_access_mask *access_mask_set) { struct landlock_ruleset *new_ruleset; /* Informs about useless ruleset. */ - if (!access_mask) + if (!access_mask_set->fs) return ERR_PTR(-ENOMSG); new_ruleset = create_ruleset(1); if (!IS_ERR(new_ruleset)) - new_ruleset->access_masks[0] = access_mask; + landlock_set_fs_access_mask(new_ruleset, access_mask_set, 0); return new_ruleset; }diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h index 32d90ce72428..bc87e5f787f7 100644 --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ #include "object.h" +/** + * struct landlock_access_mask - A helper structure to handle different mask types + */ +struct landlock_access_mask { + /** + * @fs: Filesystem access mask. + */ + u16 fs; +};
Removing this struct would simplify the code.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ /** * struct landlock_layer - Access rights for a given layer */@@ -140,7 +150,8 @@ struct landlock_ruleset { }; }; -struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const u32 access_mask); +struct landlock_ruleset *landlock_create_ruleset(const struct landlock_access_mask + *access_mask_set); void landlock_put_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset); void landlock_put_ruleset_deferred(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset);@@ -162,4 +173,10 @@ static inline void landlock_get_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset) refcount_inc(&ruleset->usage); } +void landlock_set_fs_access_mask(struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset, + const struct landlock_access_mask *access_mask_set, + u16 mask_level); + +u32 landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset, u16 mask_level); + #endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_RULESET_H */diff --git a/security/landlock/syscalls.c b/security/landlock/syscalls.c index f1d86311df7e..5931b666321d 100644 --- a/security/landlock/syscalls.c +++ b/security/landlock/syscalls.c@@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(landlock_create_ruleset, { struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr; struct landlock_ruleset *ruleset; + struct landlock_access_mask access_mask_set = {.fs = 0}; int err, ruleset_fd; /* Build-time checks. */@@ -185,9 +186,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(landlock_create_ruleset, if ((ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs | LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS) != LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS) return -EINVAL; + access_mask_set.fs = ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs; /* Checks arguments and transforms to kernel struct. */ - ruleset = landlock_create_ruleset(ruleset_attr.handled_access_fs); + ruleset = landlock_create_ruleset(&access_mask_set); if (IS_ERR(ruleset)) return PTR_ERR(ruleset);@@ -343,8 +345,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(landlock_add_rule, * Checks that allowed_access matches the @ruleset constraints * (ruleset->access_masks[0] is automatically upgraded to 64-bits). */ - if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | ruleset->access_masks[0]) != - ruleset->access_masks[0]) { + + if ((path_beneath_attr.allowed_access | landlock_get_fs_access_mask(ruleset, 0)) != + landlock_get_fs_access_mask(ruleset, 0)) { err = -EINVAL; goto out_put_ruleset; } --2.25.1