Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/6] ptp: Support hardware clocks with additional free running time
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-03-07 14:05:41
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-03-07 14:05:41
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 01:07:51PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
Richard Cochran wrote:quoted
You are adding eight bytes per frame for what is arguably an extreme niche case.I don't think it is a niche case, btw. I was always wondering why NXP introduced the vclock thingy. And apparently it is for 802.1AS-rev, but one use case for that is 802.1Qbv and there you'll need a (synchronized) hardware clock to control the gates. So while we can have multiple time domain support with the vclock, we cannot use Qbv with them. That was something I have always wondered about. Or.. maybe I'm missing something here.
Niche is relative. Believe it or not, the overwhelmingly great majority of people using Linux have no interest in TSN. Thanks, Richard