On Feb 8, 2022, at 9:28 AM, Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 10:26 PM Song Liu [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Instead of BUG_ON(), fail gracefully and return orig_prog.
Fixes: 1022a5498f6f ("bpf, x86_64: Use bpf_jit_binary_pack_alloc")
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 643f38b91e30..08e8fd8f954a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2380,7 +2380,11 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
*
* Both cases are serious bugs that we should not continue.
I tweaked that comment a bit, since it's no longer accurate and
pushed to bpf-next.
Thanks!
Thanks for the fix! I had that in mind initially, but forgot about it
when I got to the keyboard.
Song