Re: [PATCH] bpf: move the bpf syscall sysctl table to its own module
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Date: 2022-02-23 04:29:02
Also in:
bpf, linux-fsdevel, lkml
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:35:29AM +0800, Yan Zhu wrote:
+static struct ctl_table bpf_syscall_table[] = {
+ {
+ .procname = "unprivileged_bpf_disabled",
+ .data = &sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_unprivileged_bpf_disabled),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = bpf_unpriv_handler,
+ .extra1 = SYSCTL_ZERO,
+ .extra2 = SYSCTL_TWO,
+ },
+ {
+ .procname = "bpf_stats_enabled",
+ .data = &bpf_stats_enabled_key.key,
+ .maxlen = sizeof(bpf_stats_enabled_key),
+ .mode = 0644,
+ .proc_handler = bpf_stats_handler,
+ },
+ { }
+};No progress towards a counted array instead of a NULL terminated one?