Thread (8 messages) 8 messages, 4 authors, 2022-02-14

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] platform: make platform_get_irq_optional() optional

From: Uwe Kleine-König <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-14 07:15:47
Also in: alsa-devel, kvm, linux-gpio, linux-i2c, linux-iio, linux-mediatek, linux-mmc, linux-phy, linux-pm, linux-pwm, linux-renesas-soc, linux-serial, linux-spi, lkml, platform-driver-x86

On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 11:16:30PM +0300, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
This patch is based on the former Andy Shevchenko's patch:

https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210331144526.19439-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ (local)

Currently platform_get_irq_optional() returns an error code even if IRQ
resource simply has not been found.  It prevents the callers from being
error code agnostic in their error handling:

	ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
	if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENXIO)
		return ret; // respect deferred probe
	if (ret > 0)
		...we get an IRQ...

All other *_optional() APIs seem to return 0 or NULL in case an optional
resource is not available.  Let's follow this good example, so that the
callers would look like:

	ret = platform_get_irq_optional(...);
	if (ret < 0)
		return ret;
	if (ret > 0)
		...we get an IRQ...

Reported-by: Matthias Schiffer <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <redacted>
While this patch is better than v1, I still don't like it for the
reasons discussed for v1. (i.e. 0 isn't usable as a dummy value which I
consider the real advantage for the other _get_optional() functions.)

Apart from that, I think the subject is badly chosen. With "Make
somefunc() optional" I would expect that you introduce a Kconfig symbol
that results in the function not being available when disabled.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help