Re: [PATCH net-next v2 5/5] net: bridge: Refactor bridge port in locked mode to use jump labels
From: Hans Schultz <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-10 09:22:28
Also in:
bridge, lkml
On tor, feb 10, 2022 at 10:31, Nikolay Aleksandrov [off-list ref] wrote:
On 09/02/2022 15:05, Hans Schultz wrote:quoted
From: Hans Schultz <redacted> As the locked mode feature is in the hot path of the bridge modules reception of packets, it needs to be refactored to use jump labels for optimization. Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <redacted> Signed-off-by: Hans Schultz <redacted> ---Why two (almost) identical sign-offs?
Ups, a mistake...
Also, as Ido mentioned, please fold this patch into patch 01.quoted
net/bridge/br_input.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++---- net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 6 ++++++ net/bridge/br_private.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index 469e3adbce07..6fc428d6bac5 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c@@ -23,6 +23,18 @@ #include "br_private.h" #include "br_private_tunnel.h" +static struct static_key_false br_input_locked_port_feature; + +void br_input_locked_port_add(void) +{ + static_branch_inc(&br_input_locked_port_feature); +} + +void br_input_locked_port_remove(void) +{ + static_branch_dec(&br_input_locked_port_feature); +} + static int br_netif_receive_skb(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) {@@ -91,10 +103,12 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb &state, &vlan)) goto out; - if (p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED) { - fdb_entry = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid); - if (!(fdb_entry && fdb_entry->dst == p)) - goto drop; + if (static_branch_unlikely(&br_input_locked_port_feature)) { + if (p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED) { + fdb_entry = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid); + if (!(fdb_entry && fdb_entry->dst == p)) + goto drop; + } } nbp_switchdev_frame_mark(p, skb);diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c index 7d4432ca9a20..e3dbe9fed75c 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_netlink.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_netlink.c@@ -860,6 +860,7 @@ static int br_set_port_state(struct net_bridge_port *p, u8 state) static void br_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[], int attrtype, unsigned long mask) { + bool locked = p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED; if (!tb[attrtype]) return;@@ -867,6 +868,11 @@ static void br_set_port_flag(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct nlattr *tb[], p->flags |= mask; else p->flags &= ~mask; + + if ((p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED) && !locked) + br_input_locked_port_add(); + if (!(p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED) && locked) + br_input_locked_port_remove(); } /* Process bridge protocol info on port */diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h index 2661dda1a92b..0ec3ef897978 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_private.h +++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h@@ -832,6 +832,8 @@ void br_manage_promisc(struct net_bridge *br); int nbp_backup_change(struct net_bridge_port *p, struct net_device *backup_dev); /* br_input.c */ +void br_input_locked_port_add(void); +void br_input_locked_port_remove(void); int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb); rx_handler_func_t *br_get_rx_handler(const struct net_device *dev);