Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next] net: kbuild: Don't default net vendor configs to y
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-02-01 08:58:11
Also in:
intel-wired-lan, linux-hyperv, linux-renesas-soc, linux-sunxi, lkml
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 10:55:14AM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, Florian Fainelli wrote:quoted
On 1/31/2022 10:35 AM, Saeed Mahameed wrote:quoted
On 31 Jan 19:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:quoted
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:59 PM Stephen Hemminger [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 09:24:50 -0800 Saeed Mahameed [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> NET_VENDOR_XYZ were defaulted to 'y' for no technical reason. Since all drivers belonging to a vendor are supposed to default to 'n', defaulting all vendors to 'n' shouldn't be an issue, and aligns well with the 'no new drivers' by default mentality. Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>This was done back when vendors were introduced in the network drivers tree. The default of Y allowed older configurations to just work.And changing the defaults means all defconfigs must be updated first, else the user's configs will end up without drivers needed.As I understand correctly, at least for most common net drivers, having NET_VENDOR_XYZ=y doesn't actually build anything, we have flags per module for each vendor and those are defaulted to N.Right, but once you start hiding NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ under a NET_VENDOR_XYZ Kconfig symbol dependency, if NET_VENDOR_XYZ is not set to Y, then you have no way to select NET_VENDOR_DRIVER_XYZ and so your old defconfig breaks.quoted
quoted
quoted
So there was a reason, not sure if it matters anymore. But it seems like useless repainting to change it now.It might make sense to tune some of the defaults (i.e. change to "default y if ARCH_*") for drivers with clear platform dependencies.either set hard default to 'n' or just keep it as is, anything else is just more confusion.Maybe the rule should go like this: any new driver vendor defaults to n, and existing ones remain set to y, until we deprecate doing that and switching them all off to n by 5.18?Forgive my ignorance, but isn't it a regression if things quit working even if it's just a configuration change?
No, kernel configs never were declared as ABI as "regular" users are not supposed to touch it. They use something provided by the distro.
From a user perspective I like having everything turned on initially so it just works. Pruning things down is a lot easier than trying to figure out what all to turn on. Especially in graphics.
I have completely opposite view here and prefer to have minimal config for my CI, and for my working machines as well. Thanks
-- Hisashi T Fujinaka - htodd@twofifty.com