Thread (26 messages) flat view 26 messages, 3 authors, 2022-02-25

Re: [PATCH net-next 06/14] net: dev: Add hardware stats support

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: 2022-02-25 16:12:21

On Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:31:23 +0100 Petr Machata wrote:
quoted
quoted
+	struct rtnl_link_stats64 *offload_xstats_l3;  
Does it make sense to stick to rtnl_link_stats64 for this?
There's a lot of.. historical baggage in that struct.  
It seemed like a reasonable default that every tool already understands.

Was there a discussion in the past about what a cross-vendor stats suite
should look like? It seems like one of those things that can be bikeshed
forever...
What I meant is take out all the link-level / PHY stuff, I don't think
any HW would be reporting these above the physical port. Basically when
you look at struct rtnl_link_stats64 we can remove everything starting
from and including collisions, right?

And looking at your patch that'd leave exactly the stats you actually
use..
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help