Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
From: Zhu, Lingshan <hidden>
Date: 2022-02-15 02:17:08
On 2/14/2022 10:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:19:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:quoted
在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:quoted
On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case, the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep the device functional. This commit handles three cases: (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1 (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case. (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ, the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most unlikely case. Otherwise, it needs to fail. This commit introduces some helper functions: ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue vector and config vector in the device config space, so that the device can send interrupt DMA. This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline. Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <redacted> --- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++-- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++- drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c@@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw) return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf); } +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector) +{ + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg; + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw); + + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select); + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector); + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid); + return -EINVAL; + }Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Caller will have to write queue select again, and that's an extra IO, which is a waste. And having function checking itself just seems better contained.quoted
quoted
+ + return 0; +} + +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector) +{ + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg; + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw); + + cfg = hw->common_cfg; + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config); + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n"); + return -EINVAL; + }Similar question as above.quoted
+ + return 0; +} + static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct virtio_pci_cap *cap) {@@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev) hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr, hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier); + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL; + return 0; }@@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw) ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw); cfg = hw->common_cfg; - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config); - - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) { if (!hw->vring[i].ready)@@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw) ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo, &cfg->queue_used_hi); ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size); - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector); - - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) { - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i); - return -EINVAL; - } - ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx); ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable); }diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768 -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0 -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1 #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6 #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40@@ -42,6 +40,13 @@ #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \ (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf) +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */ +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1 +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */ +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2 +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */ +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config interrupt should be rare.Yes but if we do not have a dedicated vector then we need an extra device IO (in fact, a read) on each interrupt.quoted
quoted
+ static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr) { return ioread8(addr);@@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw { u8 __iomem *isr; /* Live migration */ u8 __iomem *lm_cfg; - u16 nr_vring;Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?quoted
/* Notification bar number */ u8 notify_bar; + u8 msix_vector_status; + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */ + u32 config_size; /* Notificaiton bar address */ void __iomem *notify_base; phys_addr_t notify_base_pa; u32 notify_off_multiplier; + u32 dev_type; u64 req_features; u64 hw_features; - u32 dev_type; struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg; void __iomem *dev_cfg; struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES]; void __iomem * const *base; char config_msix_name[256]; struct vdpa_callback config_cb; - unsigned int config_irq; - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */ - u32 config_size; + int config_irq; + int vqs_shared_irq; + u16 nr_vring; }; struct ifcvf_adapter {@@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num); struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw); int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw); u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw); +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector); +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector); #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644 --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation" #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf" +/* handles config interrupt */This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since it's easily to deduce it from the function name below.quoted
static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg) { struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;@@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +/* handles vqs interrupt */So did this.quoted
static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg) { struct vring_info *vring = arg;@@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg) return IRQ_HANDLED; } +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */ +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg) +{ + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg; + struct vring_info *vring; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { + vring = &vf->vring[i]; + if (vring->cb.callback) + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private); + } + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */ +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)shared is not a good name given IRQ_SHARED is not set. maybe "common"? "reused"?
Sure, I can do better naming Thanks
quoted
quoted
+{ + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg; + u8 isr; + + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr first and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.no, vf->isr is not set for VQ interrupts. If need to actually poke at the VQ to know.quoted
Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with IFCVF.It's a MSI, not INT#. So interrupt is not shared as such - it's only sharing vector between config and vq.quoted
quoted
+ if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG) + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg); + + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg); +} + static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data) { pci_free_irq_vectors(data); } -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues) +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues) { struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; int i; + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) { + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) { + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]); + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL; + } + } else { + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf); + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL; + } +} - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) { - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]); - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL; +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt, + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED + */ + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) { + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf); + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL; } +} + +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf); + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues); + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter); ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev); }@@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) return ret; } -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) { struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq; - u16 max_intr; + int i, vector, ret, irq; - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter); - if (!(nvectors > 0)) - return nvectors; + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i); + vector = i; + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0, + vf->vring[i].msix_name, + &vf->vring[i]); + if (ret) { + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i); + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i); + } else { + vf->vring[i].irq = irq; + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector); + } + } - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1; + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL; + + return 0; +} + +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + int i, vector, ret, irq; + + vector = 0; + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.quoted
+ snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev)); + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0, + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf); + if (ret) { + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n"); + + return ret; + } + + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq; + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL; + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector); + } + + return 0; + +} + +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + int i, vector, ret, irq; + + vector = 0; + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */ + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev)); + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0, + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf); + if (ret) { + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n"); - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr, - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX); - if (ret < 0) { - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n"); return ret; } + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq; + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL; + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector); + } + + vf->config_irq = irq; + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector); + + return 0; + +} + +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + int ret; + + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter); + else + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter); + + return ret; +} + +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{ + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev; + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + int config_vector, ret; + + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) + return 0; + + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */ + config_vector = vf->nr_vring; + + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG) + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */ + config_vector = 1; + snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n", pci_name(pdev)); - vector = 0; - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector); ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, ifcvf_config_changed, 0, vf->config_msix_name, vf); if (ret) { IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n"); + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring); return ret; } - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) { - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", - pci_name(pdev), i); - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF; - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector); - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0, - vf->vring[i].msix_name, - &vf->vring[i]); - if (ret) { - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i); - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i); + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector); - return ret; - } + return 0; +} + +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter) +{As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the code could be greatly simplified. ThanksWell it is claimed there are platforms where we are short on vectors. 3 versus 2 seems a 50% saving. You disagree?quoted
quoted
+ struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf; + int nvectors, ret, max_intr; - vf->vring[i].irq = irq; + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter); + if (!(nvectors > 0)) + return nvectors; + + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG; + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1; + if (nvectors < max_intr) + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG; + + if (nvectors == 1) { + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED; + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter); + + return ret; } + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter); + if (ret) + return ret; + + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter); + + if (ret) + return ret; + return 0; }@@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev, { struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev); - return vf->vring[qid].irq; + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0) + return vf->vring[qid].irq; + else + return -EINVAL; } static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,