RE: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device without FDs

-----Original Message-----
From: Harald Welte <redacted>
Sent: piątek, 11 lutego 2022 10:12
To: Marcin Szycik <redacted>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com; Drewek, Wojciech <redacted>;
davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; pablo@netfilter.org; osmocom-net-gprs@lists.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device without FDs

Hi Harald,

Thanks for triggering CI.
Do I see correctly that results for our changes are the same as for master?

Regards,
Wojtek

Hi Marcin,

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:04:01PM +0100, Marcin Szycik wrote:

quoted

On 05-Feb-22 17:34, Harald Welte wrote:

quoted

Hi Marcin, Wojciech,

thanks for the revised patch. In general it looks fine to me.

Do you have a public git tree with your patchset applied?  I'm asking as
we do have automatic testing in place at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/ where I
just need to specify a remote git repo andit will build this kernel and
run the test suite.

I've created a public fork with our patchset applied, please see [1].

Thanks, I've triggered a build, let's hope it works out.  Results should
be at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/
and detailed logs at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/console

The same testsuite executed  against master can be seen at
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-latest-torvalds/
[the high amount of test cases failing is due to the lack of IPv6 support in the kernel GTP].

Let's hope your forked repo renders identical test results to upstream!

Regards,
	Harald
--
- Harald Welte [off-list ref]            http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)