Re: [PATCH net-next 06/15] ipv6/gro: insert temporary HBH/jumbo header
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Date: 2022-02-03 15:48:28
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 1:20 AM Paolo Abeni [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, 2022-02-02 at 17:51 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:quoted
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Following patch will add GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE, allowing gro to build BIG TCP ipv6 packets (bigger than 64K). This patch changes ipv6_gro_complete() to insert a HBH/jumbo header so that resulting packet can go through IPv6/TCP stacks. Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> --- net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c index d37a79a8554e92a1dcaa6fd023cafe2114841ece..dac6f60436e167a3d979fef02f25fc039c6ed37d 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_offload.c@@ -318,15 +318,43 @@ static struct sk_buff *ip4ip6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int ipv6_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) { const struct net_offload *ops; - struct ipv6hdr *iph = (struct ipv6hdr *)(skb->data + nhoff); + struct ipv6hdr *iph; int err = -ENOSYS; + u32 payload_len; if (skb->encapsulation) { skb_set_inner_protocol(skb, cpu_to_be16(ETH_P_IPV6)); skb_set_inner_network_header(skb, nhoff); } - iph->payload_len = htons(skb->len - nhoff - sizeof(*iph)); + payload_len = skb->len - nhoff - sizeof(*iph); + if (unlikely(payload_len > IPV6_MAXPLEN)) { + struct hop_jumbo_hdr *hop_jumbo; + int hoplen = sizeof(*hop_jumbo); + + /* Move network header left */ + memmove(skb_mac_header(skb) - hoplen, skb_mac_header(skb), + skb->transport_header - skb->mac_header);I was wondering if we should check for enough headroom and what about TCP over UDP tunnel, then I read the next patch ;)
The check about headroom is provided in the following patch (ipv6: add GRO_IPV6_MAX_SIZE), which allows GRO stack to build packets bigger than 64KB, if drivers provided enough headroom (8 bytes). They usually provide NET_SKB_PAD (64 bytes or more) Before the next patch, this code is dead. Also current patch set does not cook BIG TCP packets for tunneled traffic (look at skb_gro_receive() changes in following patch)
I think a comment here referring to the constraint enforced by skb_gro_receive() could help, or perhaps squashing the 2 patches?!?
Well no, we spent time making small patches to ease review, and these patches have different authors anyway.
Thanks! Paolo