Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 3 authors, 2022-01-31

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/2] Split bpf_sock dst_port field

From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Date: 2022-01-31 20:53:48
Also in: bpf

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref]:

On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 12:55:16 +0100 you wrote:
This is a follow-up to discussion around the idea of making dst_port in struct
bpf_sock a 16-bit field that happened in [1].

v2:
- use an anonymous field for zero padding (Alexei)

v1:
- keep dst_field offset unchanged to prevent existing BPF program breakage
  (Martin)
- allow 8-bit loads from dst_port[0] and [1]
- add test coverage for the verifier and the context access converter

[...]
Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2,1/2] bpf: Make dst_port field in struct bpf_sock 16-bit wide
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/4421a582718a
  - [bpf-next,v2,2/2] selftests/bpf: Extend verifier and bpf_sock tests for dst_port loads
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/8f50f16ff39d

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help