Thread (15 messages) 15 messages, 3 authors, 2022-02-11

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for XDP_REDIRECT in bpf_prog_run()

flat view

From: Alexei Starovoitov <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-08 19:32:52
Also in: bpf

On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 1:54 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [off-list ref] wrote:
+
+#define NUM_PKTS 1000000
It takes 7 seconds on my kvm with kasan and lockdep
and will take much longer in BPF CI.
So it needs to be lower otherwise CI will struggle.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+       /* The XDP program we run with bpf_prog_run() will cycle through all
+        * three xmit (PASS/TX/REDIRECT) return codes starting from above, and
+        * ending up with PASS, so we should end up with two packets on the dst
+        * iface and NUM_PKTS-2 in the TC hook. We match the packets on the UDP
+        * payload.
+        */
could you keep cycling through all return codes?
That should make the test stronger.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+       /* We enable forwarding in the test namespace because that will cause
+        * the packets that go through the kernel stack (with XDP_PASS) to be
+        * forwarded back out the same interface (because of the packet dst
+        * combined with the interface addresses). When this happens, the
+        * regular forwarding path will end up going through the same
+        * veth_xdp_xmit() call as the XDP_REDIRECT code, which can cause a
+        * deadlock if it happens on the same CPU. There's a local_bh_disable()
+        * in the test_run code to prevent this, but an earlier version of the
+        * code didn't have this, so we keep the test behaviour to make sure the
+        * bug doesn't resurface.
+        */
+       SYS("sysctl -qw net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1");
Does it mean that without forwarding=1 the kernel will dead lock ?!
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help