Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 3 authors, 2022-01-06

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add selftest for XDP_REDIRECT in bpf_prog_run()

flat view

From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <hidden>
Date: 2022-01-06 14:35:01
Also in: bpf

Alexei Starovoitov [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 04:08:12PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
quoted
+
+#define NUM_PKTS 3
May be send a bit more than 3 packets?
Just to test skb_list logic for XDP_PASS.
OK, can do.
quoted
+
+	/* We setup a veth pair that we can not only XDP_REDIRECT packets
+	 * between, but also route them. The test packet (defined above) has
+	 * address information so it will be routed back out the same interface
+	 * after it has been received, which will allow it to be picked up by
+	 * the XDP program on the destination interface.
+	 *
+	 * The XDP program we run with bpf_prog_run() will cycle through all
+	 * four return codes (DROP/PASS/TX/REDIRECT), so we should end up with
+	 * NUM_PKTS - 1 packets seen on the dst iface. We match the packets on
+	 * the UDP payload.
+	 */
+	SYS("ip link add veth_src type veth peer name veth_dst");
+	SYS("ip link set dev veth_src address 00:11:22:33:44:55");
+	SYS("ip link set dev veth_dst address 66:77:88:99:aa:bb");
+	SYS("ip link set dev veth_src up");
+	SYS("ip link set dev veth_dst up");
+	SYS("ip addr add dev veth_src fc00::1/64");
+	SYS("ip addr add dev veth_dst fc00::2/64");
+	SYS("ip neigh add fc00::2 dev veth_src lladdr 66:77:88:99:aa:bb");
+	SYS("sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1");
These commands pollute current netns. The test has to create its own netns
like other tests do.
Right, will fix.
The forwarding=1 is odd. Nothing in the comments or commit logs
talks about it.
Hmm, yeah, should probably have added an explanation, sorry about that :)
I'm guessing it's due to patch 6 limitation of picking loopback
for XDP_PASS and XDP_TX, right?
There is ingress_ifindex field in struct xdp_md.
May be use that to setup dev and rxq in test_run in patch 6?
Then there will be no need to hack through forwarding=1 ?
No, as you note there's already ingress_ifindex to set the device, and
the test does use that:

+	memcpy(skel->rodata->expect_dst, &pkt_udp.eth.h_dest, ETH_ALEN);
+	skel->rodata->ifindex_out = ifindex_src;
+	ctx_in.ingress_ifindex = ifindex_src;

I enable forwarding because the XDP program that counts the packets is
running on the other end of the veth pair (on veth_dst), while the
traffic gen is using veth_src as its ingress ifindex. So for XDP_TX and
XDP_REDIRECT we send the frame back out the veth device, and it ends up
being processed by the XDP program on veth_dst, and counted. But when
the test program returns XDP_PASS, the packet will go up the frame; so
to get it back to the counting program I enable forwarding and set the
packet dst IP so that the stack routes it back out the same interface.

I'll admit this is a bit hacky; I guess I can add a second TC ingress
program that will count the packets being XDP_PASS'ed instead...

-Toke
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help